PLEASE LOGIN TO USE THE TRAY

Nuts About Southwest > BlogSouthwest > Viva Mexico

  Viva Mexico

Viva Mexico

 
 
We're codesharing with who...or is it whom...I always forget, but who cares? I should be writing this in Spanish...do you write in Spanish? Wow, I'm struggling today with what few writing skills I have,  probably because I'm so excited about the announcement of our second International codeshare partner - Volaris.
 
It's Volaris...yes Volaris! You know, if you fuse the Spanish word volar (to fly) with the word Polaris (North Star) you get Volaris? Well, that's how they came up with their name, and I think it's a pretty cool name. What's even cooler is that Volaris is an exceptional low-cost airline flying in Mexico. They are focused on high levels of Customer Service and provide a great inflight experience. Volaris plans to begin flying in to the US sometime in 2009 and will become Southwest Airlines' Mexico codeshare partner in early 2010. If you haven't heard of Volaris, here's a little information that should give you a feel for them and why we think they will be a great partner!
 
Like our new codeshare partner WestJet, Volaris presently serves some pretty cool destinations...or should I say hot destinations! Places like Cancun, Cabo, Puerto Vallarta, and Acapulco are certainly great places to vacation. Mexico City (via Toluca), Monterrey, and Guadalajara are great business travel destinations and will complement our efforts to attract more business travelers.
 
Also, like WestJet, Volaris has a fun corporate culture. On one of our visits to their Headquarters, their VP of Sales was having his head shaved in front of the Volaris Employees—it was payback for the Employees who had met a revenue goal that he challenged them to meet. Their Employees are very energetic and love their airline. Their Customers join in the fun as well. They recently had an inflight concert! My favorite Customer experience was influenced by the free tequila and cerveza they served! They also give away Krispy Kreme donuts! It's a regular Fiesta!!! Oh yes, and every Volaris plane is named after one of their valued Customers. I can't wait to see Ricardo!
 
Unlike WestJet, Volaris is an unknown brand in the US. Although they are relatively small and certainly new (they began flying in 2006), Volaris has proven themselves itself as a successful and viable airline and are developing a new generation of flyers in Mexico. Coupled with the Southwest brand, network, and Customer base, the opportunities are huge.
 
Okay, enough of my rambling, whadoyouthink? 
 

 

Trackback URL for this post:

http://blogsouthwest.com/trackback/1677
Your rating: None Average: 2 (32 votes)

Comments

Viva Volaris!

Fantastic news! The piece of the international puzzle are coming together. I wonder what's next. :)

Great to hear Southwest is expanding its codeshare network. Although I haven't flown on Volaris, I trust your guys' judgment in partners. I can't wait to be able to utilize my RapidRewards to fly all over the world.

This is so exciting! Viva Mejico! Congratulations to your Team. Thank you all for working so hard to take SWA into new frontiers.

whadoIthink? I think it was about time. This is absolutely great news. I fly to Mexico very often (I am originally from there but have been in Houston for the last 20 years), and there is no competitive pricing. I hope you can really change that and sounds like you just might. Cancun, Mexico City, Puerto and Cabo are all great destinations that I frequent, especially Mexico City and Cancun. Sooooo, buen trabajo, y Felicidades mi amigo!!!

Southwest Airlines is a 800 pound gorilla. They should do all the flying to Canada and Mexico themselves. Preservation of their Company's name, solid service and employee relations will increase overall profitability and shareholder value.

As an employee, I'm disgusted with the continued outsourcing of our jobs. I guess the company loves us all, unless they can find someone to do the job that we could do for cheaper. This is just one step closer to "Southwest the travel agent", not "Southwest AIRLINES."

this is great news!!! i can't wait to see this happen and book a vacation to mexico!

Why isn't Southwest flying these routes ourselves? GK announced zero growth for 09' yet we codeshare?

What is it with Southwest that cannot (for the life of me) offer an international destination with their own planes? Not even Puerto Rico (domestic)?.... People, to make money you have to SPEND money and take some risks!!!! The days of making profits flying from DAL to AMA are gone. Seriously, why everything with Southwest has to be "half-baked"? Is like all that faith they profess for their people is not quite there... They don't think they can pull it off by themselves. So, we are offering service to Canada and Mexico but it will be done by other airlines and don't even think about using Rapid Reward credits for these destinations cuz we are gonna ask you for double points (remember Hawaii with ATA)? I don't get it....

Of course, if Volaris plans to serve the US in 2009 doesn't materialize Southwest is ready to add a little something (you betcha!) to the "seamless" experience.... They will shuttle you from San Diego (Southwest "international" gateway) to Tijuana (Volaris destination) in a comfortable school bus. Business Select customers will be guaranteed a seat in the front of the bus!....

Why can Spirit, JetBlue and Airtran do it and you guys can't?

Great news that SWA is expanding it's service to Mexico through its codesharing partnership with Volaris. That is a catchy name for a nice, niche airline that emphasizes fun, customer service and low fares. Hmmm...now who does that sound like? Seems like Southwest has found an ideal partner to take it's loyal customer base to those sought-after destinations in Mexico.

Southwest: are you MexiCAN or MexiCAN'T? Why you and your awesome crews cannot do the job?

You had me at free Teq......Lol
I think this is wonderful and could not have been announced any sooner. This is great to hear that you guys are going after other airlines to help give your customers an expanded, and that many more reasons to fly the No-Hidden Fee Airline, Southwest!! Luv ya guys!

Joseph R. Meyers

Dallas, Texas

Add me to the list of customers and employees who don't understand why SWA isn't doing this flying on it's own metal. Seems the only way to ensure that YOUR customers are happy is to provide the service YOURSELF! SWA seems to be running scared these days. Look at MSP service! MDW only...wow.

The more I think of this the more I am disgusted that SWA management doesn't have faith in us to pull off flying this with our own metal. Volaris doesn't even fly to the US!!! So they can accomplish the task but we can't.

Let me guess what the company response would be like. Probably will go a little like this:

"Mexico is an interesting case. Mexican passengers appear to heavily favor Mexican air carriers, traveling roundtrip from Mexico to the U.S. For Southwest to be successful on a trans-border city pair, we would have to "win over" a significant share of Mexicans. History suggests, that will be difficult to accomplish. In total, Mexico is a relatively small country, population-wise. If we were growing the fleet, we have better opportunities with much less risk. Of course, we may not be in a position to grow the fleet now, anyway. Once we are, codeshare or not, we may never serve Mexico."

Not feeling the LUV anymore!!

Very disappointing that you don't trust your own people to do the job... And very convenient too; if WestJet or Volaris go down our do something wrong you'll wash your hands a la Pontius Pilates! (like you did with ATA Hawaii). Sad that an airline known by their guts, audacity and innovation has become so stagnant. On my next trip to Mexico I will take Jetblue, Spirit or Airtran... they flyy their own planes there!

OMG. Shut up (made infamous by Elaine from Seinfeld)! This is the best news EVER! Ever ever! Love you!

This is unbelievable! Is this a new grotwh trend for Southwest? You can surely fly to Mexico with your own resources.... I'm selling my stock today!

JetBlue, Spirit, Airtran: MexiCANS

Southwest: MexiCAN'Ts

I agree, why doesn't Southwest do it with their own crews and planes?

I understand the front line employee's worries about international growth coming from codeshares. Not flying WN metal over the boarders reduces risk to the domestic ops. The tweny minute turn will never work for intl destinations due to the paperwork required and such. I used to work for AA. In comparison WN staff have got it easy as far as company relations go. Flying around the world as AA does is not that great when the airline treats you as completely dispossable.

Are you also planning to code-share to Puerto Rico?

I guess that the implicit message here is that you don't believe that your own pilots and flight attendants (And everybody else) can do the job efficiently.... So you "partially love and trust them, right?

Andrew,

Andrew states -- "I used to work for AA. In comparison WN staff have got it easy as far as company relations go."

Those relations are getting very strained with announcements like this that are in direct violation of the pilot contract that is in negotiations right now. There are a lot of employees that are angry over this.

Herb isn't here anymore and it's pretty evident of that fact.

Signed,

Very worried about the future of SWA.

Why not do codesharing for now for international so you can expand on your own into places like NYC,BOS,ATL,CLT,MEM,etc. here in the United States which I think you need to do first and then you can take over the international flying later when you're ready. Let's not put the cart before the horse. Also, many airlines do both codeshare and own metal international flying. Why can't you??? It's better for your customers and I thought that that was goal to begin with.

Andrew,
"I used to work for AA. In comparison WN staff have got it easy as far as company relations go."

**********************************

This has nothing to do with that. Judging by their recent announcement Southwest seems to have lost faith in their own people.... Why even low-cost carriers can serve near international destinations and Southwest can't. I bet that they can come up with creative solutions to make the deal work. Seems to me that by outsourcing they are saying that other people can do it cheaper and better.... Not cool, at all. as a customer I'm very turned off by yet another co-share
announcement from you guys.... I support your employees views 100%. Missing Herb already!

Warrior Spirit...Really??? I guess Gary needs to rethink the company's mission statement. It would probably be cheaper for you guys to just close up the Dallas base too, and sell tickets on American. All you would need is a computer. In fact why don't you just polish all of the airplanes silver because guess what, you have just become every other failed legacy. Great Job on becoming American Airlines!!!

Southwest Airlines should be flying these new routes. Period. They should be flown in Southwest Airlines aircraft that are crewed by Southwest Airlines Flight Pilots and Flight Attendants, handled by Southwest Airlines ramp and customer service agents, and maintained by Southwest Airlines mechanics.

Grow OUR airline!!!

Why isn't SWA moving the metal in and out of MX & Canada?!? Gary has said there is opportunity for growth within the CONUS. Then why aren't we doing it? We're not. Codeshare is wrong and a produces a negative impact on the Employees, morale and Culture of SWA.

Southwest is going to send our valued customers on a Mexican airline that is only two years old. They are using their inexperienced pilots whle farming out our pilot jobs.

DING, you are now free to move about the country, a foreign country with inexperienced pilots flying airplanes being maintained by inexperienced mechanics. Good luck.

Great to hear Southwest is expanding its codeshare network. Although I haven't flown on Volaris, I trust your guys' judgment in partners. I can't wait to be able to utilize my RapidRewards to fly all over the world.

MIchael Barber — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 11:11

*********

Michael, you must live in a very small world! LOL

____________________________________________

In my opinion, Southwest is sending a bad message with this announcements... We shouldn't expect new cities in the future, instead stay tuned for future code share agreements.....

Is this how Southwest care about hispanics? Saying that they are too good to fly to our airports?

Good news? NOT

Just say it: You are never flying overseas. Just say it!

This is a very dangerous step for Southwest Airlines. I believe the company is really starting to stray from the culture and relationship they have with their employees. This could very well be the bridge to outsourcing our jobs. I can see how they would codeshare overseas, but to our neighbors? WestJet will fly customers using the same equipment we use. Not to sure about this brand new company Volaris, but if they can fly international, why can't this 37 year veteran of the airline industry. It is scary to think we may slip into the "legacy" category where employees are disgruntled and do not trust their employer.

Are you concerned Mr. Gary Kelly?

The company has to be sure that it is going to be successful in every market we enter. Given the uncertainty of the industry right now, it's probably a good idea to stick to what we're good at in order to weather these times.

Not to mention, given the current state of the economy, I don't think it's smart for SWA to rapidly expand into unknown territory (international routes). You're correct: It could be very successful, but it also could flop.

You also have to consider that flying internationally opens up a whole new regulatory framework: SWA would be subject to aviation regulations of other countries, as well as ICAO. Having to transition everything could have substantial cost involved.

I'm not saying that international routes would be bad, but I highly doubt that this is the time to be entering such risky markets.

The security of my family is now under attack by my employer.

Codeshare to gain market share or to increase revenue longterm does not work for the employees of Southwest Airlines.

As a loyal Southwest passenger, who do you want to fly you to Mexico? A Southwest crew of 5 or a Volaris crew of ?????

30+ years of the safest operations of any airline in history, and now we are going to turn our hard won customers over to a two year old airline flying into some of the most challenging airports in North America.

I guess the employees that made this company great are too stupid in the company's view to fly south to Mexico or North to Canada.

Herb where are you?

Pissed Off Employee

It seems like a good thing, but at the same time I also dont understand why swa isnt flying there ourselves. Our planes can do it and there are plenty of spanish speaking people out there that can use the jobs that are perfect for the company. I really think that southwest should consider doing it themselves instead of going outside the company.

This is very disturbing news to our frontline employees here at Southwest. This is one step closer to completely outsourcing our jobs. Southwest was on the way to outsourcing our maintenance back in March before that was swept under the rug because of the FAA fines. We work our little tushies off to keep our customers happy. I can't tell you how many times I am yelled at for something out of my control, and all I do is smile, nod, say I'm sorry and offer a free drink... and by the end of the flight the customer is happy and won't ever fly any airline but Southwest again. These code shares will ruin that. Our customers fly Southwest because of us, the employees, and our great customer service. We do not have any control over what kind of service any other airline gives. Also Andrew, by committing to these code shares our company IS treating us and our hard work as completely disposable.

Signed,
Very Concerned

I wonder what is behind this announcement? Why is made over a year in advance? If this is some kind of bullying against Frontier, JetBlue, Spirit or Airtran (expanding to Mexico with their equipment) is going to backfire. People will ALWAYS prefer to do the whole trip in one airline and no this ambiguous deal...

I guess the employees that made this company great are too stupid in the company's view to fly south to Mexico or North to Canada....

****************

Right on! Southwest has more faith in a newly opened airline (and their employees) that doesn't even serve the US yet.... Yep, they must think that you guys are not qualified, smart, civilized or creative enough to pull it of. Kudos to JetBlue, Airtran and Spirit for believing in their employees and making low-cost travel to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean a profitable reality!

Gary Kelly,

I always read your column in LUV Lines and you always preach how valuable we employees are. Then you do something like this. While I understand the WestJet codeshare this is completely different. Your love of numbers is undermining the culture and hard work Herb and Colleen have built up over 30+ years. Flying international isn't a monumental undertaking. If our business model doesn't fit into international flying then we need to change the model. We, the employees, are up to the task. We always have been. At what point did the numbers become more important than the people?

You made a great call during your tenure on fuel hedges. It was risky, innovative, and very SWA like. Where is that Gary Kelly? I miss him.

Sincerely,

LUV Lost

Is this the future of Southwest? Where is the consistent product? Are your pilots too dumb or redneck to fly to Mexico? Are your crews too ignorant? I don't think so. I know they can pull it off. would luv to have low-cost reliable and friendly service to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. Too bad that you don't seem to believe in the same people that made your company great!

Southwest Airlines is a 800 pound gorilla. They should do all the flying to Canada and Mexico themselves. Preservation of their Company's name, solid service and employee relations will increase overall profitability and shareholder value.

*******

Agree 100%

As a long-time Employee, I think this is good news. Airline codesharing is already benefiting other airlines and their Customers all over the world (with little financial risk to the carriers).
I personally would be more worried about the future of Southwest Airlines if we were sitting on our hands not doing anything at all. The international codeshare plans have been out there for awhile, so forgive me that I’m a little confused by the shock of some to this news.

People fly on SWA because of the great customer service. We are no longer the cheapest ticket. We don't have anything the other airlines have. i.e. roomy cabin, TVs, internet, assigned seats, etc... What we have they don't is great customer service... Why is it we would farm out our flying to other companies at the expense of the employees here? Our one strength is about to be destroyed by making moves like this. The unhappy employees this is creating will chase every customer away because we will be just like every other airline without the ammenities. The pilots and flight attendants are the keys to making the customer happy and they will be the most unhappy over this kind of announcement due to their seniority system of advancing their careers. On top of it we held off on the SWAlife news as if it were supposed to be some great news everyone was going to cheer for like opening another city. This is truly the saddest day in my tenure at SWA.

A very unhappy SWA employee

Gary et al,

From my family and from my heart, thank you for the high paying and secure job we've enjoyed at SWA for the last 9 years. You've met or exceeded every expectation we had for an employer.

I've never run a Billion $ company so any emotional rant I could offer would sound just as intelligent as all the others. But judging by your track record of stable jobs, stable wages, and as stable a profit as is possible in this era, I'm confident this decision is at least as prudent as all your others.

Keep working to make SWA great!

I'm very concerned that we are outsourcing our NAME BRAND to whom?? Who is Volaris?

18 aircraft and 1500 employees? How do we codeshare w/ someone who doesn't cross the border? How can their little startup figure out how to get to the U.S. and our HUGE 500+ airline can't figure out how to go international?

Very disturbing news today. This is the first time I'm actually worried about our airline.

OMG are they going to "codeshare" back to profitabilty? I knew it: US Airways, AA, United, Frontier, Spirit, JetBlue and Continental employees are smarter and more competent that the Southwest ones.... The have been flying our flag to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean for years without outsourcing!

Is Southwest becoming a legacy airline? PSA all over again?

Warrior Spirit?

...to code-share?

Okay, enough of my rambling, whadoyouthink?

***********

IT STINKS! AND IS PATRONIZING AND CONDESCENDING TOWARD YOUR OWN PEOPLE. GROW UP AND STOP WONDERING WHY YOUR STOCK IS SO LOW!

This is sooooo wrong at so many levels.... Agree with most of the comments above. You need to trust more in your own people!

I use Southwest exclusively for domestic travel and legacy flag carriers for international travel (including Mexico). I am not sold on the value of codesharing. First, when flying international my preference is for non-stop flights and I don't see these deals offering me any options out of New England on Southwest's metal or anyone else's. Second, I never trust a situation where two vendors can point the finger at each other when something gets messed up... if I buy a ticket from an airline I want to be their customer, not someone else's customer on a codeshare.

As a customer I value the fact that Southwest is cautious even if that means I don't see a route that I would like but in this case I think JetBlue is making the right play.

You should subcontract every future destination then... Why fly it yourself? Outsourcing is cheaper and less risky... And don't worry about those "whiny" employees... they come and go! Besides, if the want to fly to Mexico, Canada or the caribbean they can work for any other airline in the country. They all (but you) fly there!

Yea Spirit, Jetblue, and Airtran are flying to the Carribean and Cancun....but lets consider a few things....Spirit has HORRIBLE customer service that SWA doesn't want, Airtran used to be Valujet(unsafe) and their employees aren't happy, and Jetblue has shaky earnings along with a JFK meltdown on the books and agreements of their own for European flying. Do you want to be like them??? These airlines also fly to BOS, LGA, JFK, EWR, ATL, CLT, MEM, etc. which you guys do not so I think you should think about taking that step with your own metal before you go to Canada and Mexico with it. Also, Herb and Colleen are still @ SWA per http://www.swamedia.com/swamedia/sidebar/officer_bios.html and picked the people who came after them who were already with the company so they obviously have confidence in them. Lastly, it looks really bad to your customers and those at the airlines partnering with you who have had no ill will against you at all when you complain and act pessimistically like this in an anonymous fashion of the blog in front us so please cosnider that as well.
-A Customer who agrees with the employee who sees it differently

So, you really don't think that the people that made your company a success for 37+ years cannot land a plane in Mexico, or have a responsible layover or pass immigration cards to customers?

ATA Deja vu all over again! As a Bi-lingual and experienced Flight Attendant I feel offended by what lies behind this decision: The assumption that we are not capable to design, retrain, make changes and deliver a superb near-international product. Your loss!!! I know I can work an international flight and deliver superior service. I also see how full our competitors serving Puerto Rico are and how foolish and stubborn we look for not serving the only domestic mayor destination in the caribbean where passports are not required...

Thumbs down!

And they think that everybody is stupid amd doesn't realize what they are trying to do? Bravo southwest employees for being pissed of!!!!! Revolt! don't let them do it! SWA DESERVES better!

Ok, so far code-share to Canada and Mexico and still looking for co-shares for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Alaska, The Caribbean and South America (not to mention Europe!). That's 4, 5 or 6 different code-shares! so that doesn't complicate things? What are we becoming? Danger, Will Robinson! Soon our res center will move to India and every new destination will be a code-share.... Depressing! time to go to one of the "other" airlines at least they still fly their own planes to their destinations!!!!!!!!!

A dose of reality here, we can barely afford to open up a new city, we are afraid anymore to go up against failing carriers like US, DL, and we yield new service and gates to weak airlines like B6, Spirit and Airtran and you'll expect us to embark on a full scale International venture?? Please!!! First of all it is EXTREMELY expensive, second it's not just a matter of "let's fly there" and third, we will not be able to go into other countries and undercut the competition by offering lower fares. Most countries have laws against this in order to protect their flag carriers. There are too many CEOs, planners wannabees in here!!

Many are concerned about Southwest "outsourcing" our jobs. They also say, "Why doesn't Southwest just fly it???" Ok, where are the extra planes going to come from? Where will our customs areas be? How will you pay for the new terminal rents in another country? Along with whatever issues are involved with flying internationally. OR.... we could just let Volaris pay for it, use their equipment, their customs areas, and use all of their resources which are ALREADY in place and IN USE. And... we get a cut of the profits!!!

Just because an employee wants to vacation somewhere doesn't mean it's a profitable route that must be serviced immediately. Cabo is a great place along with Cancun. But how many business passengers are on those flights? Those are all frequent flyer miles and leisure fares... passengers who save up all year round for this one trip.

Codesharing is a fantastic idea at this point in our economy and state of the company. Or we could end up like ATA, Aloha, etc... I'll take codesharing!

It is sad that Mr. Kelley wants to ruin the airline built on trust from the employees. The very people that are supposed to be the first customer. If SWA planes can get their SWA crews should be flying the routes. The public needs to be aware that the pilots at Volaris arent as qualified as SWA pilots. They arent trained to the same standards. Both pilots at SWA are qualified as Captains and EVERY pilot has been a captain prior to working for SWA. Volaris crew will have minimal experience. The airline itself will have minimal experience where as SWA has been at it for 37 years.

It is to bad Mr. Kelley has so much disregard towards his employees. He will be the down fall of Southwest Airlines. I will sell my stock in the company, due to the fact they no longer want to grow the airline. They just want to be a travel agency. The employees will lose their drive and motivation, with that SWA will suffer. The employees built it he will tear it down. They are looking more like a Legacy carrier everyday.

Southwest, what are you thinking? Are you kidding me? Have you now stooped so low as to just become another American brand name that has just outsourced itself to the cheapest bidder? What can we expect next? To talk to outsourced reservation agents "based" in Bangladesh (or the like) like the individuals I got to "converse" with during your ATA codeshare debacle? Wow! Now that was an experience! Not enjoyable to be sure, neither my scheduling/coordinating experience nor the flight segment on ATA! When I book Southwest, I want to fly Southwest!

Dear employee who likes codeshare, how will you feel when your job is outsourced to India or Pakistan or another subcontractor like Mensies or SABRE or a host of low rate companies who would love to fill your job with a mimimum wage or better yet overseas employee? Not so easy to let this codshare thing get started now, is it?

To the flying public:

This is not what it seems. This is outsourcing of pilot and flight attendant jobs, the same pilots and flight attendants who are so happy to service you our customers. In place of our own growth, and in place of our traditional "go it alone" strategy under your beloved Herb, our new CEO and ex CFO has decided that outsourcing our jobs is the future culture of Southwest Airlines.

This is a perfect example of the victory of theory and numbers over just plane common sense. First the FAA maintenance scandal, then the open labor contracts, now outsourcing. Our culture is under fire and our airline is becoming just another legacy airline.

I'm tired of going the extra mile so these bean counters can destroy our airline. The emperor has no clothes. We miss you Herb.

I have to say I love this. Lets see, they do the work, they do the flying, they load the bags in Mexico and we make the money. Hmmmm. We lose out how? I would say the only bad thing about them is they fly Airbus and not BOEING. So tell me exactly how do we lose out? Oh I have that answer too. We can't use our passes on them so we lose out on free trips to Mexcio.

It’s understandable that some Employees and Customers would have questions as to why we would choose to codeshare rather than fly our own aircraft on international routes. While our current focus is on codeshare service, our leaders has said that flying our own aircraft outside of the United States is not out of the question, it’s simply not our focus at this time and in this economic environment.

Right now, with a weakening economy, unpredictable fuel prices, and slowing Customer demand, the level of investment that would be required for us to fly international routes ourselves simply doesn’t make sense for Southwest Airlines. The idea is to first restore our Company’s profitability to levels that would justify adding the necessary airplanes, flights, destinations, and jobs needed to sustain such growth.

For now, codesharing is a way for us to grow our revenues and profits without taking on the risk of adding expensive aircraft to our fleet. It allows us to fill seats that would otherwise go empty, and it allows us to add destinations that we otherwise might not serve.

As you may recall, we entered into our first codeshare agreement with ATA Airlines in February 2005, and that relationship generated $40 million in additional revenue in 2007. That codeshare agreement was in place until April 3, 2008, when ATA announced its plans to discontinue service. Of course, we were disappointed with the news because we believe the ATA codeshare was a success. For that reason, we began to actively pursue other codeshare opportunities.

On July 8, we announced our first international service by signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOA) with WestJet. WestJet was named Canada's most admired corporate culture in 2005, 2006, and 2007, and we believe WestJet will be a solid match for both our Culture and our level of service.

Today we announced our MOA with Volaris, a Mexico-based carrier. While some of the comments here have questioned the choice, Volaris is known for competitive pricing and has earned the reputation for being Mexico’s most ontime carrier. For those reasons, among others, we believe Volaris is also a great fit for Southwest Airlines.

An important point to remember about codesharing is that it only adds a marginal number of Customers per flight. However, this margin helps us sustain our own flights, especially in this environment of rising fares and declining traffic.

I am a Southwest Dispatcher who is VERY happy about this new opportunity. Why? It's a cheap, low-risk way to test the market and add significant revenue with a quality partner. If our Customers respond well to international service via our codeshares, I have no doubt that we'll operate international flights with our own metal and Employees. Operating international service ourselves would be expensive, complex, and risky. Until we are highly confident it will be profitable and successful, it's better to let another airline assume that risk.

Paula, that was LAME even for Southwest. This is just sad. This company lost its "mojo"...

If you think flight attendants and pilots WANT to take a 10 hour "vacation" overnight after a 12 1/2 hour work day to Tijuana or Cancun you must work at Headquarters in Dallas. We don't even NEED to overnight there!!!! We have PLENTY of stations that we could fly turns to Mexico from. If you don't know what "turn" means it means going from one station to another and directly back to the same station. Why let a company other than ours bring OUR passengers to and from the states? Because neither one of these code share partners are unionized and their workforce makes HALF of what we do now. It may be costly to set up these stations initially, but the time, dedication and customer service Southwest employees provide is proven and well worth the cost in the long run. You at Headquarters should be concerned as well. There are only so many VP positions to go around when Southwest Airlines STOPS growing.

I love the ones trying to be condescending with their fellow employees and accusing them of being brats "because they cannot non-rev to Mexico". That's very superficial, I believe... and in any case I know that Southwest have very good non-rev agreements with all the airlines that do fly there.... Wake up! This is more than a bunch of brats throwing a tantrum... I have read a lot of legitimate concerns!

Is codeshare really the new endgame for SWA? Has GK decided to transform this AIRLINE into a TRAVEL AGENCY? 35 years of good will rapidly being frittered away... :(

Flight crews have been battling the codeshare "creep" (initials GK) for a while now and so far our so called employee friendly CEO has lied to us about his intentions from the days of ATA. Now he's promised the pilots one thing and we read in the media quite another. Gary's post Herb free ride is OVER if you ask me. The man can dress up in whatever cute Halloween costumes he likes, but as of today the fun is over.

Wow, I find it hard to believe some of the rhetoric I've read about outsourcing. Say what you will about Volaris, I only heard about them for the first time today while reading this announcment, but don't even think about trying to brand codeshare with Westjet as outsourcing or thinking of them as some second level operation not worthy of partnering with Southwest. Fact is, WestJet does it very well, probably even better than Southwest. Yes, they took a model that Southwest created and perfected it to another level. And there are some who are very worried about Canadian customers boarding a flight in Canada connecting in the US and suddenly being herded like cattle the Southwest way. The Southwest model, in its purity, would not be tolerated by most Canadian travellers and thats why Westjet had to modify it. Codeshare is a great way to gain exposure in a different country without the risk and complication of regulations, Customs, and cultural expectations. Westjet flies to the US, the Carribean and Mexico. Southwest does not need to worry about its brand when partnering with Westjet. That's a solid partnership. Seperate the Volaris announcement from the Westjet announcment. It's like NAFTA. That sucking sound you hear going south started in the north. Mexico is to the US as the US is to Canada regarding job loss and outsourcing. Once you get that you'll realize how absurd outsourcing claims to Canada really is.

Paula,

Traditionally our airline grew in some of its strongest spurts during recession and under our founders direction. Herb grew and managed an airline competently. Gary, Mike and Laura are deal makers. Have you forgotten the life long members of Herbs team who endlessly were shown the door when Gary took over? It was disrespect and it was change through trauma.

This is the airline industry and contrary to what you goes on at the endless Prom Week and Frat Party in Dallas, we're working our tails off out on line and for what. We're stagnant in growth, we have no advancement, our commuters are treated like second class citizens, and now we're watching our gates, our rampers, and our airline utilize lower wage crews to replace us.

If you're really a traditional Southwest type, you'd see this as very un-Southwest. If you or someone else at the GO were to voice similar complaints from your end of the world, I know the flight attendants and pilots would back you. We are a family are we not?

Are you serious?

At some point, growth has to be checked. Why? Because if you outgrow your skeleton, your vital organs aren't protected. Southwest has never flown through the type of economic climate that it is flying in now. All I hear is people talking like union members (our contract says BLAH BLAH BLAH, we want the work etc). It isn't Southwest that has changed, it's YOU. Being #1 makes people forget how they got to this point and you would be best advised not to forget it.

Codesharing brings traffic from another region to your aircraft without you having to go and get them. Let Volaris bring more people to your existing routes at THEIR expense. This may be the last quarter Southwest puts cash in the bank for some time, but doing the downturn, you want to still fly like Southwest, right? You want to still make money, right? Of course you do and that is why new growth must utilize the strengths of your network.

Volaris seems to be well regarded in Mexico. Be careful with the sentiment that a well regarded Mexican airline is unable to provide high quality service. It sounds a lot like Mexican bashing and you don't want to go down that road. You would be surprised how much transportation innovation there is in Mexico. They seem to be the Southwest of 25 years ago.

Management has claimed that Southwest employees are the best, and their pilots are the hardest working and most productive pilots in the industry. Their reward? Outsourcing and the impression that Southwest pilots may be capable of flying from L.A. to Providence, but an airline that has been in business for two years have pilots more qualified to fly from Phoenix to Mexico City...

Wake up employees, this affects EVERYONE! Employees built this company, don't let the company give the fruits of your labor to another company and their employees!

And to those who still think Herb was/is the Messiah, call a bookie in Vegas and see what the odds are on him working on this deal before his big farewell and Coleen's final show of "LUV" to the pilots...

And to those customers who think this is just "hunky dory", your ticket purchase to Mexico and anywhere else this leads to, helps the inevitble loss of jobs to Southwest employees.
It's only the beginning folks...If those who truly realize the damage that is done with outsourcing need to book a flight to any of the codeshare cities, I, for one, hope they book their flights on another carrier!

UNITY!!!

Could someone in the IT department please turn the troll filters back on?

Thank you.

I\'m a flight attendant and I\'m concerned. I have a young son and I\'m a single mother. When I first started at Southwest 10 years ago everyone here was so kind and team oriented and those were the days of our triple crown performance. We made record profits, we were highly paid, and we were all on the same team. I trusted Herb and his people.

What I\'m confused about is Gary Kelly. He seemed at first to be a continuation of Herb\'s team but now I\'m not so sure. First when that ATA codeshare came out, we thought it was temporary and they said to trust them. We did. Then came all those flights to Hawaii but this we already had those Midway gates right? Then came WestJet but why can\'t we fly to Canada? Now its Mexico but again why can\'t we go there.

As we grow this way, I still commute. My son sits without his mom a lot. Now we just had a loss which I\'m not sure but I don\'t think we had a loss under Herb did we? What is going on with Southwest Airlines? We seem like American now and Gary I don\'t know who you think you are.

It appears that the negatives are outweighing the "this is wonderful news" and all posts aren't being allowed...

Coincidence? I think not...

Of course, it coud be a computer glitch. Guess I could call tech support, but I don't feel like supporting that outsourcing either...

I'm shocked Gary Kelly didn't have something written in SWAlife or a video of why he has decided to embark on more codeshares. If we fly internationally and make X million is it not enough? We have to make XX million more using a substandard airline and throwing our own employees under the bus. We are taking our brand and tossing it in the toilet. We saw that with the ATA codeshare but we didn't learn a thing from it.

PAULA, why don't we just start laying off employees to save a few bucks and connect Volaris with JetBlue and Airtran through our website. We'll collect a small percentage of the profits then we won't have to take any risks at all or incur any costs associated with flying airplanes. We haven't even tested the waters with WestJet and you are already proclaiming it a success. Absolutely amazing!!!

Employee wishing Herb was still at the helm....

They are hundreds of negative reactions to this FIASCO. The overwhelming majority is against this mess. Please don't let them fool you. They're filtering a cascade of angry letters from employees and customers.... This is the end of Southwest as we know it!

Gary,

Please stop all this and post something on SWAlife for us. Clearly the negativity on this forum is outweighing the positives and people are scared. They are the frontline employees who deal directly with the customer and if they aren't informed then we will lose customers in droves. If they are unhappy then the customer will be unhappy. Doesn't matter how many cheerful "desk operators" we have here in Dallas. We aren't the ones who make it all happen.

They, the frontline employees, are clearly scared for their jobs, future advancement possibilities, and most of all scared you are tearing this airline down from all that it was built to be. I don't believe it to be true but we need you now more than ever.

Please, get out and inform those who work hard for you everyday. If there was any time in our history that SWA needed heartfelt leadership it is now. If you truly believe the employees are the heart and soul of this airline and dollar signs aren't as important as they are then please speak out and lead us.

We kind of goofed off when they made the WestJet announcement, but this is too much! One new destination in years with only a couple of flights a day and all this friggin' outsorcing!!!! Enough! Give us back our airline. Don't treat us like IDIOTS! We are good enough to fly overseas with our own resources... I don't believe anything you say Gary Kelly... None of your vitriolic announcements (us flying internationally, WI-FI, new unforms, corporate image, new destinations) have materialized. Meanwhile, JetBlue hasn't made any of these announcements and have increased presence in Mexico and the Caribbean, improved their inflight entertainment, etc, etc. Enough of the "whatever we can get by with culture" WE ARE SICK OF THIS CRAP!

Dear Very Concerned Employee - Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and concerns here on the blog.

I apologize if I was unclear in my previous comment. If you reread it, I think you will find that I did not make any claims of success regarding our not yet active codeshare with WestJet. My claim of success was regarding the relationship and financial benefits of the ATA codeshare.

Of course, I don’t want to see a single Southwest Employee laid off. While we may disagree on the virtues of codeshares, I hope we share the same since interest in our Company’s longevity and solvency.

For All of you that think Volaris has inexperienced pilots and f/a's you are WRONG! Volaris is VERY WELL maintained and employs experienced crew. I would say better than most US carriers. Needless to say employs Mexicans only which makes it unique. To be a pilot as well as a f/a for the airline you have to go through a very very intense hiring process and training. They do not just hire of the street like the US did for a while. Not that its a bad thing. I congratulate SWA for choosing Volaris as a codeshare, because they both offer great and unique customer service to their passengers. You should all try flying Volairs someday. Its in a way Mexico's Virgin America!

PAULA,

Why is it so many airlines are successful flying internationally but we have to codeshare our airline out? JetBlue now has a strong presence in the Caribbean and while they aren't making hundreds of millions they are successful. We will be soon announcing another codeshare to the caribbean and Hawaii also. Priceless... While flying to Hawaii has historically been a money loser we easily could make money flying to the caribbean but we won't. We are the only airline who can't make international flying happen. Wait....we can but we won't because codesharing will be able to bolster a few million in our pockets without risking a dime. Well, congrats I guess everyone has their price. Unfortunately the price here is the frontline employees career advancement by job creation. While you are wooping it up at the Friday deck parties drinking the kool-aid we are seeing the culture of our airline erode right before our eyes. Yes the culture is in each of us but that only goes so far because viruses spread fast. Unless you aren't reading the postings on this blog then you can see how fast our airline is about to be compared to AA and United all in the same breath.

The answer to all of this is Gary is a bean counter. If he can make 100 million codesharing then he doesn't care that we could make 5 million doing it on our own. I don't believe he has weighed out the negative effects of codesharing.

Your explanation doesn't hold water.

PRINT THESE LETTERS! THEY ARE ERASING SOME OF THEM. THE NUMBER OF COMMENTS HAS BEEN DECREASING DURING THE LAST 30 MINUTES!

An annoymous poster states, "To be a (Volaris) pilot as well as a f/a for the airline you have to go through a very very intense hiring process and training."

Really? I was a flight instructor for many years and one of my students went from flying piper aircraft with 300 hours to being a First Officer for a well known Mexican airline. Every SWA pilot is a qualified captain and SWA has the best safety record in the industry. No airline flying 2 years can claim anything. If you aren't a pilot then don't post about pilot hiring or flying. You don't get it no matter how much you think you do.

The mentality of the majority of the comments here is frightening and typical fear mongering.

The fact is that WN would be lucky to survive on their own doing flights into Canada.

Canadians have no history with WN and furthermore have had the luxury of 2 fierce competitors that have competed on price and product. The end result is very affordable air travel with service and amenities that WN could not compete with.

With price being equal, few Canadians would choose WN (with the cattle call) when they can travel on WestJet or Air Canada for the same price and get LiveTV/AVOD, pre seat assignment, etc...

As for north bound US originating traffic, WN would only have the benefit of O/D traffic. Anyone looking to connect in Canada would be still be much better suited traveling on Star Alliance carriers to connect inter-Canada with Air Canada.

All WN would accomplish by competing as a stand alone into Canada would be a reduction of fares that the others would obviously match as they always do. End result would be low loads at reduced yield.

The code share with WestJet is the best possible options. Canadians love WestJet and will drive revenue to WN with none of the downside of operating as a stand alone. The benefit is huge as the only other full option from the US to a network of Canadian cities is a monopoly via the Star Alliance. Now there is a second robust option with a WN/WS code share. This would not exist if WN were to do point to point to a select group of Canadian cities.

Furthermore, Canadians just don't have that connection with WN. For many, they see WN as the same as all the other US legacy airlines that Canadians love to hate. Ask them about WN and the first thing they'll do is groan about the cattle call!

To be honest, I'm sure WS is slightly concerned about how their Guests will adjust to the transfer from a WS flight to a WN flight. Canadians connecting to WN will be appalled that they'll have to stand at the gate for a few hours to get a decent seat with their friend. Where's my TV is what others will gripe!

As a previous posted noted, WS started with a WN business plan and had to evolve to stay successful in the Canadian market place. If they still mirrored the WN service model, they would be dead in the water. instead, they have kept the WN style focus on costs and have evolved their product into a solid product, allowing them to have some of the best operating margins in the airline industry while rating alongside some of the most respected organizations in the world for their product and service.

Check your ego's at the door and recognize the WN/WS deal for what it is...mutually beneficial for all.

Regarding the following comment:

PRINT THESE LETTERS! THEY ARE ERASING SOME OF THEM. THE NUMBER OF COMMENTS HAS BEEN DECREASING DURING THE LAST 30 MINUTES!

Anonymous — Tue, 11/11/2008 - 01:47

That is simply not an accurate statement. Not a single comment has been deleted from this strand, nor has there been a single comment that has not been posted.

It would take a long time for Southwest to expand into these markets on their own and you have no brand recognition in either to speak of at this point in time. So why not go ahead and get the full monetary benefit of being there right now with two reputable carriers in those markets and use that to build your market share and recognition and keep yourself financially healthy while you slowly expand on your own for what would undoubtedly be a more successful venture than had you done it on your own to start out with. It's incredibly disappointing to hear so much about and see your culture over the years and then find this happening(depressing).

So let me get this straight. You think you are going to lose job because of a codshare. I think most people should worry about technology taking over your job and not a codeshare. I can not see in any way how this hurts our company. The only thing that can happen is that we make even more money so we do not have to finaly start laying off people. As an ops agent I am way more worried about my departmet going away. Can anyone give a good reason why this is bad? Sorry I just do not see it.

Regarding safety, consider that WN would have to come up with a whole new set of ramp procedures to turn a flight in Canada. 95% of the processes currently used would be considered to be unsafe labour practices in the employee friendly country of Canada. The right to refuse unsafe work would be invoked by the time the first flight had the nose gear chocked.

Also (and this is more of a joke), there would need to be a new WN Canadian uniform as no Canadian would frequent an airline (or any other business for that matter) that styles itself with khaki shorts and white runners as a uniform. White runners don't exist in Canada...for good reason!!

On top of it we held off on the SWAlife news as if it were supposed to be some great news everyone was going to cheer for like opening another city. This is truly the saddest day in my tenure at SWA.

********

Indeed

To ALL Customers---

As an employee of Southwest Airlines, I feel it important to apologize for all the negativity on this particular topic. We ALL appreciate your business and get great joy out of getting you to all of your important life events - safely. This codeshare is and will be an exciting time in our Company's history and we hope we'll still see you on board either in Tulsa or Toluca, Cleveland or Cancun.

The idea that Southwest Airlines can't start its own international service because it doesn't have the name recognition, marketing prowess, and international experience of Volaris is a cruel hoax on Southwest employees.

Using Southwest Airlines assets to grow another airline is outsourcing. Southwest's website is every bit as much of an asset as airplanes, and it will now be used to sell tickets for passengers that will not step foot on a Southwest Airplane.

I wonder if it's possible to outsource management to Richard Branson?

How can Volaris go International to the U.S. BUT we can't afford to go intl to Mexico??
We have billions (with a B) in the bank, do they? We OWN most of our airplanes, do they? If the economy is so bad, how do they figure it out?

We were told the reason for codeshare w/ ATA was for the Midway gates, which we got. $40M of revenue is a drop in the bucket.

If we need extra cash, how bout a surcharge on unattended minors who we baby sit ALL day w/ a huge risk to us for ABSOLUTELY FREE! I even pay my babysitter $10/hr per kid! We already do the work, let's take in the money like every other airline does and like we do w/ business select.

If Southwest Airlines can start a code-share agreement to generate a modest amount of revenue, with little to no risk, I say its a great thing! With that said, why is Southwest STILL NOT entering the largest origin and destination market (NYC) in the world? I say open up shop in NYC(LGA has an opp for 14 slots), HNL, SJU and even CLT with the profits this so called code-share with these international carriers will create. TAKE A CHANCE. All of the legacy carriers are expanding internationally including USAirways to TLV who has been bankrupt how many times? Employee morale is down, profits are stagnate. No one wants to change planes and carriers when they can get a nice comfortable non-stop on the jetBlues and the AirTrans of America. Good luck Southwest, what happend to that Warrior Spirit? I think your employees can handle- and would have been willing to accept the challenge. You better do something, and something quick to rekindle an excitment with your employees and your shareholders.

It is disappointing to see growth to foreign countries being facilitated by a US company, when that company is capable of doing the work itself, and its employees are working without contracts for over 2 years. SWA should refocus on invigorating its product, rebuilding morale, and getting into the mindset of growing ITS OWN PRODUCT, RATHER THAN FOREIGN CARRIERS.

My faith in our leadership is lost. Diluting our hard-earned brand with foreign carriers to fly flights that we could be doing tomorrow is unbelievable. I don't believe in our company anymore.

You are outsourcing our jobs and nearly everyone knows it. If you won't protect my career and career expectations, how can you expect me to go above and beyond and provide POS? Herb has left the building and I'm not impressed with our new direction.

I'm no longer drinking koolaid,
Just a Number

For the first time in 6 years, I just don't care anymore. SWA has become a job, not an exciting career. So much for the employees going above and beyond, the minimum will be enough.

This all started wth ATA - " we just want the gates" - now this.

Instead of a CEO, SWA has a CFO in charge. The real leadership left with Herb.

I wouldn't trust a newer upstart Mexican carrier to keep the safety record of LUV. Bad news for LUV employees

CODE-SHARE = OUTSOURCING OF USA JOBS !!!!!

Like many of Southwest employees' I don't understand why they just don't fly the routes themselves? AA packs out several flights a day to Cancun for $600 a pop, why would we send these jobs south?

I'm shocked at all the employee negativity on this site. While codesharing clearly isn't in the best interest of those who rely on seniority for their careers (me being one of them) we are currently in the worst economic times since the great depression. Unless you live under a rock, you know every major bank is in trouble. All the american car companies are in trouble. If they fail the aftershocks to other companies will cause about 3,000,000 people with lost jobs. The last thing unemployed people and people on a tight budget do is spend money on flying. This codeshare sucks!! BUT I bet if we weren't in such bad economic times we would be flying our own metal. Despite what the Canadian post says we would kick tail in Canada and Mexico.

Gary hasn't led us astray yet but I do hope to hear from him soon because this negativity needs to stop or we will all be on the street looking for jobs.

Mr. Kelly,
Are you listening to all of these negative comments?
It seems as though nobody has any faith in your abilities. Employees losing faith. Customers. And most important to you, Wall Street has shown zero faith in your leadership during your entire tenure.
Code share is only good for management and their bloated bonuses.
Thanks for continuing on the outsourcing of American jobs path. That has worked SO well for your CEO contemporaries.
Sign me unwilling to go the extra mile with Mr. Kelly at the helm.

To All Our Customers Out There:

Who do you trust flying you around the country....Southwest Airlines Pilots and Flight Attendents OR some upstart airline in Mexico with an UNKNOWN record??? Leave the flying to us....we are not dummies. We have the money, resources, AND safety record to do this type of flying and get you to your destinations safely. Our pilots come from all backgrounds. To say that we have NO international experience, is an understatement. We have former astronauts, military members, regional pilots, etc.... With our experience, international flying will not be a problem at all. Think about this....what's going to happen when this upstart airline, with inexperienced pilots, were to have some type of safety incident? Who do you trust, our pilots who've all around the world....even in the most hostile environments, OR some upstart airline who is virtually unknown???

ANOTHER concerned employee

After wading through 100+ post’s worth of the same apparent union talking points trashing the codeshare, it’s clear that most of the people protesting here don’t have a solid grasp of the realities of today’s airline environment.

To be sure, SWA could operate its own metal to Canadian and Mexican destinations, but as with most choices, there are pros and cons. International ops are not the same as domestic ops, and anyone who truly knows anything about SWA history knows that our operations are predicated open the ability to efficiently turn aircraft around, which is something that international ops are not especially conducive to.

The fear-mongering claims of out-sourcing aside, the desire by employees to “grow” the airline to international destinations with SWA metal and personnel is understandable, but there is a time and a place for everything. There are still plenty of domestic destinations and routes as yet unserved that provide that advancement path for personnel, so it’s not an either/or situation with respect to international ops. If anything, the Westjet/Volaris codesharing is actually risk-sharing, and also allows for the concurrent development of both international and domestic markets, presuming that the economy doesn’t tank any further and recovers. As we saw with the two previous codeshares, they’re not forever, and when it’s deemed to be in SWA’s best corporate interest to serve international destinations ourselves, we undoubtedly will. Until then, codesharing is a viable option.

Perhaps all the armchair CEOs posting here could focus their efforts on doing their own jobs and serving the Customers, and leave the executive decisions of the airline to Gary Kelly (and it boggles me that some here can’t even spell his name correctly) and our other leaders.

Call me a mindless drone or Kool-aid drinker if you must to make yourself feel better, but doing so doesn’t change the underlying fundamentals of the economy and industry today, nor how SWA must deal with them.

The Southwest Spirit is alive and well. The Southwest family continues to lead the industry in terms of Customer Service, our People, operations, and financial health, all the while truly giving America the Freedom to Fly.

This codeshare with Volaris - along with the previously announced agreement with WestJet, new service to Minneapolis/St. Paul, inflight Wi-Fi,...the list goes on and on - helps to ensure that Southwest is best positioned for any and all growth opportunities that lie ahead.

It's an exciting time for the Southwest Family, for our Customers, and for the those that have yet to have had the opportunity to fly with us. This codeshare, which connects the network of our innovative, intensely Customer-oriented company with that of an innovative, intensely Customer-oriented airline from south of the border, only enhances the future of Southwest Airlines by giving our Customers greater travel options, allowing our Employees the opportunity to win over even more hearts of the travelling public, and cementing Southwest's role as the industry leader.

I'm thrilled with this announcement.

Southwest Airlines is a very diverse airlines and hires people from all walks of life and every ethnic background. Volaris, on the other hand, will only hire Mexican employees. Not only will Volaris be taking jobs away from Southwest Airline employees, management is handing over revenue to a company who is blatantly practicing discrimination...

Way to go Gary Kelly, working for peanuts just took on a whole new meaning...

POS always stood for "Positively Outrageous Service", I'm sure it has a different meaning to the employees with regards to codesharing...

I wonder if it's possible to outsource management to Richard Branson?

******************************************

Brilliant! ....Or code-share management with JetBlue?

Seems like Mr. Kelly has lost the LUV.
This is nothing more than outsourcing of jobs. Executive office jobs are next. Open your eyes people. Mr. Kelly does not LUV you. He LUVs money. Mr. Kelly LUVs Wall Street. Wall Street has not returned the LUV. Mr. Kelly gets huge bonuses and stock options. You get to deal with "doing more with less".

MANY other airlines have been codesharing for YEARS! Why does everyone all of a sudden thinks it's a bad thing? ....BECAUSE THEY only know SWA and forget there's a world out there much bigger than where you work!!!!!!

People, remember that by starting out with a codeshare we can see what works and what doesn't before we jump in head first. If a codeshare fails, you stop selling it.... if a new route on WN metal fails you have a WHOLE other mess to clean up. We have employees who can't even tell the difference between a -300 and -700 and you seriously think we're ready to do Intl paperwork and fly Intl......HAHA! It's not as easy as you think.

OPEN YOUR MINDS.... in order to fly Intl a lot here would change and when we've got people who can't even dress appropriately or act accordingly I don't think we have any business leaving the country with that. We're not a regional airline, we're the biggest in the USA and until we realize that and act like it then we have no business going elsewhere. I for one trust that the company is being smart and that these codeshares are a good thing.

So let me get this straight again: Southwest Airlines doesn't have the resources to initiate international service but Volaris, JetBlue, Airtran and Spirit do? Didn't we spent millions in revamping our customers facilities and in the "new" boarding process? Mmmmmmmm

Dear traveling public, in the interest of your safety, please ensure you utilize a US based Flag carrier for all your foreign travel needs. American, Continental, Jetblue, etc. You cannot trust your life on a third world country startup. Just read the small print about liabilty on the back of that international boarding card...

To ALL Customers---

As an employee of Southwest Airlines, I feel it important to apologize for all the negativity on this particular topic. We ALL appreciate your business and get great joy out of getting you to all of your important life events - safely. This codeshare is and will be an exciting time in our Company's history and we hope we'll still see you on board either in Tulsa or Toluca, Cleveland or Cancun.

Employee — Tue, 11/11/2008 - 03:04
*****************************************************
It'll be to Tulsa and Cleveland brownoser! add Amarillo and Midland for fun. I will also like to apologize to our customers for being so misleading (business select, wi-fi, international destinations you can go with your RR points) and promising so much and not really delivering... I will also like to apologize for having 6-hour -ong flights with only 2 lavatories and 2 trash containers (and no entertainment). And for having grumpy crews sometimes... We don't get breaks!

Don't think for a moment that you will get the SWA quality of service on this carrier. SWA should be flying and operating these routes themselves.

Your customers are not impressed with the way you're acting in this particular blog discussion. Isn't this kind of the High School way to deal with your concerns? Most of you are disregarding what the customers have said which is rude, dumping on your new partner which is rude because they didn't do anything to you, and talking about what a pain it is and how you don't plan to go the extra when your job in particular isn't changing AT ALL and not exactly calling out to customers to fly with you. This is LAME.

Why hasn't our leadership displayed the Warrior Spirit that we are always urged to display? Our company has retreated into its peanut shell. Our "Big Announcements" are now announcing growth in other companies, and glee that we can make money from outsourcing via our website. How sad.

As an employee, I am concerned about the direction our management is taking this company. With this annoucement it shows an alarming trend to continue to outsource our jobs. For 30 + years Herb and his management team always put his customers and employees first. They built this airline into a well known brand, known for the great service the employees provided. Mr. Kelly, while a smart "money guy", he is on course to unravel one of the greatest mangement-labor relations an airline has ever enjoyed. I would hope that Mr. Kelly rethinks his direction for this airline or we will go by the way like so many others before!

People, remember that by starting out with a codeshare we can see what works and what doesn't before we jump in head first. If a codeshare fails, you stop selling it.... if a new route on WN metal fails you have a WHOLE other mess to clean up. We have employees who can't even tell the difference between a -300 and -700 and you seriously think we're ready to do Intl paperwork and fly Intl......HAHA! It's not as easy as you think.

OPEN YOUR MINDS.... in order to fly Intl a lot here would change and when we've got people who can't even dress appropriately or act accordingly I don't think we have any business leaving the country with that. We're not a regional airline, we're the biggest in the USA and until we realize that and act like it then we have no business going elsewhere. I for one trust that the company is being smart and that these codeshares are a good thing.

************

Wow! I bet management shares this view. In a nutshell: Y'all are a bunch of ignorant rednecks not capable of working and international flight.... Although, ok to fly domestically.

I will also like to apologize for having 6-hour -ong flights with only 2 lavatories and 2 trash containers (and no entertainment). And for having grumpy crews sometimes... We don't get breaks!

********

Amen! and for all the stuff we do to let the get away with it!.... I just had it... I'm showing up for work and to wait for mode code-shares to be announced. Zero excitement, zero challenges, just serve peanuts between Dallas and Amarillo, and do it fast, It's a short flight!

This continued outsourcing of Southwest jobs will be the end of Southwest airlines. The morale among line employees is being absolutely destroyed, and with it the good name of Southwest airlines. I am an employee and I'm so disgusted with how this company continually tells its employees they're the best, yet turns around and makes decisions that hurt the employees. I'm afraid GK will be known as the one who destroyed Southwest. Personally, I don't see how Herb can stand by and watch the company he started and worked so hard at for years turn into what it is becoming - just another major airline that abuses its labor. So we can trust the safety of our passengers on a two year old upstart w/ no international experience? And we can't do this ourselves? I for one will be honest with our customers when they express concerns about Volaris.

Mr Kelly,

Next time you are about announcing another of these depressing deals, please save the theatrics... (like waiting almost 'till noon to release the information in Today@SWA) This info can be processed overnight along with articles like how to make a b-day cake with toilet paper and all the other garbage about cook-outs and costumes...

Unbelievable! Then we wonder what's going on with our stock.... Gary save all that "Is not a matter of if, but when" talk. Really, don't. We don't believe you so just save it. We are not competent enough to fly from Phoenix to Toluca... we get it. Just stop making all this grandiose announcements that never materialize! Please, stop it!

Southwest Airlines... Outsourcing you from Tulsa to Guadalajara!

The company has not outsourced ANYONE'S JOB! You have to take a job away from someone to outsource it... and nobody has "lost" their jobs due to codeshares.

"Outsourcing involves the transfer of the management and/or day-to-day execution of an entire business function to an external service provider."

We haven't done that. It's a codeshare, everyone has them and we've had them before with ATA and Iceland Air. Stop spreading inaccurate ignorant statements about "outsourcing". Do any of you have ANY idea how huge it is to initiate Intl service? Sure the other carriers are doing it but our operations are NOTHING like theirs. They have varied fleets, sub-fleets and a whole other way of operating. I for one am proud of these codeshares!

This airline is becoming the LAMEST ever! I come back to work like a zombie knowing that I'll be flying between Tampa and Fort Lauderdale the whole day. We got to the point where all the exciting news are how other airlines are going to take our costumers to Toronto, Montreal Vancouver, Toluca, Guadalajara and Cancun.... Laaaaaaame!

To all of you who are confused as to why so many employees thing this is a very bad thing, let me just say this. No one here wants to go to Mexico or Canada just for a "good vacation location" like someone earlier wrote. Most of us could care less were we are going, as long as we are growing. If we were growing as fast as we could, it would be one thing to codeshare, but we aren't. For those of you who work in DAL, just look at the aircraft with the white painted over the tail. Those are airplanes that we are getting rid of while announcing that we are going to us a different company to do flying WE could do. Those airplanes equal JOBS. I know it doesn't seem like your jobs in the GO depend on those airplanes, but they do. This isn't just about pilot and flight attendants. Everybody should be worried. If you work in dispatch, how would you feel if the company said we are going to keep all of you, but all future dispatchers are going to be hired in Mexico into our Mexico dispatch office. (By the way, how did the OPS center work out for you all?) How about we open a Canadian Res center? or an Indian business office? I'm not a huge union guy, but I know a bad thing when I see it, and this is a bad thing. We grow ZERO (GO and all), and we subsidies another company's growth. WAKE UP!

"Doing more with less". The way of the future in SWA... Be scared, be reaaaaally scared. Soon they are going to announce that the Wi-fi deal is not viable and we will be required to do puppet shows with our dirty socks during flight....

Your customers are not impressed with the way you're acting in this particular blog discussion. Isn't this kind of the High School way to deal with your concerns? Most of you are disregarding what the customers have said which is rude, dumping on your new partner which is rude because they didn't do anything to you, and talking about what a pain it is and how you don't plan to go the extra when your job in particular isn't changing AT ALL and not exactly calling out to customers to fly with you. This is LAME.

***********

Welcome to our LAME world. These are the only venues where we can vent this, because mngmt. doesn't listen and if you dare to question you are not a team player... This company is like Jonestown!

Your customers are not impressed with the way you're acting in this particular blog discussion. Isn't this kind of the High School way to deal with your concerns? Most of you are disregarding what the customers have said which is rude, dumping on your new partner which is rude because they didn't do anything to you, and talking about what a pain it is and how you don't plan to go the extra when your job in particular isn't changing AT ALL and not exactly calling out to customers to fly with you. This is LAME.

I respectfully disagree. As a Southwest customer, I admire the workforce coming together to voice the concerns that are on everyone's minds these days, and that is job loss due to
outsourcing when there is a more than adequate and qualified group that can do the job themselves. Airline executives are notorious for "Golden Parachutes" and given what is going on currently in our economy, there IS a cause for concern among Southwest employees.

A customer who understands

If you are a Southwest Flight Attendant and you are not concern about this check open time (or FA/TT) for tomorrow in OAK, PHX and LAS... Multiply that x 10 and that's your future!

Gary Kelly,

How many beans is the good will of your employee groups worth?

Warrior Spirit on the Shuttle By United from HERB..."Their gonna get nuked!"

Warrior Spirit on flying to Mexico from GARY..."Well I don't know. That's an awful lot of paperwork. Maybe we ought to have someone else do it."

Do moron airline CEO's not understand what brand loyalty is? People fly on SWA because they like SWA. Ticket prices between carriers are often the same and people choose SWA with this in mind. I suggest the knuckleheads at SWA HQ read "Hard Landing" and review how well code sharing work out for those brands and for their employees. This is an abortion... SWA should be doing this flying. Period. If American Eagle, Gulfstream International and Frontier can all manage to cross a border with pax, SWA should be able to as well. This is not splitting the atom folks.

Our customers are always my top priority. I, and all of the employees of Southwest Airlines have absolutely no control of customer experience when that customer has no contact with a Southwest airlines employee.

Our management has decided that it is our best interest to use Southwest's name and reputation (Southwest.com) to sell tickets with an itinerary solely on another airline. Those tickets would be available through the other airline's website, but Southwest has taken it upon itself to use it's own infrastructure to grow another company with cheaper labor while it shrinks it's own flight schedule. If that isn't outsourcing, I don't know what is.

As front-line employees, we live and breathe the "make it happen" attitude everyday when we do quick aircraft turns, help each other when we struggle, and dig in to "git er dun." I hope that as employees we never display the "no I can't" attitude that is so prevalent at other airlines, and now manifests itself in our front office.

I am concerned about codesharing with an airline that has not been in service 3 years as of yet and then I too wonder why Southwest cannot make the trip themselves.

>>>For those of you who work in DAL, just look at the aircraft with the white painted over the tail. Those are airplanes that we are getting rid of while announcing that we are going to us a different company to do flying WE could do. Those airplanes equal JOBS.

That's one of several leased -300s SWA are being returned to their lessors. With new -700s arriving, the net fleet growth is flat. All of this has been in response to slowing economy, and has been openly and previously dicussed, and you'll note that there haven't been any layoffs.

If you're going to cite facts, how about doing so in the proper context instead of the disingenuous way that you have?

Don't fly code-share flights! fly JetBlue, Frontier, Continental, AA, United, Spirit, Airtran, Delta and all the other American carriers that will take you to Mexico and Canada on THEIR OWN metal and will be held accountable in case something goes wrong!

Gary is treating us like a father promising their kids a trip to Disneyland that will never materialize... Just be honest and say it: Southwest Airlines will never fly international. Never, ever!

Why can't Southwest figure out Southwest customers don't won't to be flown on an airline that isn't flown by Southwest pilots?

How long as Volaris been in business? What are their requirements to get a job at Volaris?
What is their safety record?

I don't fly on foreign airlines who haven't been in business long enough to have a track record, nor will I fly on an airline who could fly the route themselves without outsourcing the route.

If Southwest chooses to outsource it's flying to Mexico, then I will outsource my business to American, JetBlue, or Airtran.

Gary Kelly, you don't get it do you? Are you hell bent on pissing off your passengers and employees? Fly these routes yourselves! That is what your employees want and what your customers want.

Why outsource your business to Mexican labor? Is it to save money? Well in the end, you get what you pay for.

a disappointed Southwest customer

Quoting:

We have employees who can't even tell the difference between a -300 and -700 and you seriously think we're ready to do Intl paperwork and fly Intl......HAHA! It's not as easy as you think.

OPEN YOUR MINDS.... in order to fly Intl a lot here would change and when we've got people who can't even dress appropriately or act accordingly I don't think we have any business leaving the country with that.

*************

Are you management? Because I know the share your point of view! Now they are showing their true colors.... I must confess, is not terribly attractive!

I just want to ask a simple question... How come that JetBlue Airways has over 40 daily departures from Boston, New York and Orlando to San Juan, Ponce and Aguadilla? (all in Puerto Rico, all domestic) they are always full and they do it effortlessly (and make money) and we view Puerto Rico as unattainable as flying to Venus?

Why Spirit and Airtran do it as well and we think that is so unreachable? Be ready SWA family, our code shares to Puerto Rico are coming!!!!

Do you think that Gary Kelly read this stuff? Do you think that he is aware of the frustration these news produced? Don't think so. He is in a bubble in Dallas getting hugs and kisses for a job well done. Wake up! Our opinion doesn't matter!

That's one of several leased -300s SWA are being returned to their lessors. With new -700s arriving, the net fleet growth is flat. All of this has been in response to slowing economy, and has been openly and previously dicussed, and you'll note that there haven't been any layoffs.

If you're going to cite facts, how about doing so in the proper context instead of the disingenuous way that you have?
Reality Check — Tue, 11/11/2008 - 14:33
***************************
So because they are leased they must not provided a job for you in the GO. Good to know. Question...What has Gary said our net growth might be next year? That's right 0%. So instead of taking our new deliveries and extending the leases on the -300 providing jobs for many people, we are going to return aircraft and grow our route structure through different companies. How's that for outsourcing. Question...What has Westjet said their growth going to be next year after the codeshare news? That's right 15%. How about Volaris? About 20%. So good old Southwest 0%, Westjet 15%, and Volaris 20%. But that doesn't matter, you already have YOUR job. How's that for a reality check?

The problem with all of this is no one knows where Gary Kelly is taking our airline. What is the 5-10 year plan. It appears it's just to codeshare and line the company pockets with money at the expense of the employees. I say this because Gary hasn't said a word about what direction he wants to take the company. If it's to codeshare then take over the routes ourselves then we need to know the plan. Right now I'm ready to listen but if there is continued silence then I need not go the extra mile to help anyone.

Thanks Gary for killing my investment. I have invested in Southwest stock for over 20 years because I had faith in their Management. I think you just convinced me to take my money elseware. Why would I believe in a management team that doesn't believe in his own employees. Southwest jets should be going to Canada and Mexico.

all the while truly giving America the Freedom to Fly...

*****

To the 62 destinations that we had and will have until the bitter end. If your plans include Mexico or Canada we'll give you the freedom of boarding a foreign carrier that will do what we don't dare to. And that's freedom!

As a decades long customer, I am troubled by many of the comments written regarding this subject.

Do I wish that SWA was in position to directly offer me expanded travel opportunities beyond the 48 states? Of course I do.
Do I understand why management might not feel comfortable with that decision in the current environment given the investment that would be required? Yes.
Will I accept a codeshare arrangement as "Plan B" to get my family to a Cancun vacation (or some yet unnamed Caribbean destination with a new partner)? Absolutely.

And when my family of 4 boards the "LUV" leg of our flight on one of the Canyon Blue birds at LAX or FLL or wherever the link occurs, I trust that the smiling crew that greets us will remember that it was my credit card that paid a few bills that day.

I appreciate that there is frustration because of the current slow growth business model. But if the alternative to that is judged to be quarterly losses and bankruptcy, then don't we all lose in the process?

By the way, thank you Mr. Kelly and staff for the nice "Winter Sale" that started today. Flying had become expensive (fuel, I know) and necessarily more infrequent. As of this moment, I have a total of 7 round trip tickets booked for myself and members of my immediate family between now and mid February. All on that little SWA credit card with a bill that hits my own mailbox once each month.

Responding to, "Don't fly code-share flights! fly JetBlue, Frontier, Continental, AA, United, Spirit, Airtran, Delta and all the other American carriers that will take you to Mexico and Canada on THEIR OWN metal and will be held accountable in case something goes wrong!"

Are you kidding me? Do you really think that a Canadian carrier won't be held accountable? Better yet, do you really think that a Canadian carrier won't hold itself accountable? Give your head a shake. Do you know anything about Canada, Canadian standards, Canadian regulations? Here's a crash course: meets or exceeds any US standard. By the way, since clearly there are experts in this blog that have failed to identify this so far: When you fly international you are governed by rules set forth under the Montreal Convention. Canada has signed it, the US has signed it. That means the air carrier under the signatory countries will follow those same rules so long as both countries have signed it. None of the codeshare and transborder flight 'experts' have identified that yet. Also, if you fly United Airlines to Canada, you have a really good chance of actually flying on Air Canada metal. That's called Star Alliance. Again, a simple oversight during the fear mongering...

Further, codeshare does not just take Southwest passengers and funnel them to a Canadian carrier, it goes the other way too--Canadians accustomed to a high level of service that will feel very different once boarding their Southwest flight in the US are going to be coming to you from Westjet. Westjet customers! Treat them well! Reading this blog makes me fearful for them.

As an employee I feel this is a bad move not only for the employees which helped build this airline, but for the customer who is going to fly on an unknown airline which began operating just 2 years ago. Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean can easily be flown by SWA employees on SWA aircraft.

If I were the CEO I would double check my beans.

It's a good thing Herb didn't have the same level of "insight" that GK has been showing - or SWA WOULD HAVE NEVER LEFT THE STATE OF TEXAS!

BRING BACK HERB.

So because they are leased they must not provided a job for you in the GO. Good to know. Question...What has Gary said our net growth might be next year? That's right 0%. So instead of taking our new deliveries and extending the leases on the -300 providing jobs for many people, we are going to return aircraft and grow our route structure through different companies. How's that for outsourcing. Question...What has Westjet said their growth going to be next year after the codeshare news? That's right 15%. How about Volaris? About 20%. So good old Southwest 0%, Westjet 15%, and Volaris 20%. But that doesn't matter, you already have YOUR job. How's that for a reality check?

***********

Bravo!

>>>>And when my family of 4 boards the "LUV" leg of our flight on one of the Canyon Blue birds at LAX or FLL or wherever the link occurs, I trust that the smiling crew that greets us will remember that it was my credit card that paid a few bills that day.

************
That's part of the problem. Gary wants to sell tickets without the "LUV Leg" as you call it on one of our airplanes via Southwest.com. You buy a ticket from LAX to Mexico all on another airline, making Southwest no better that the travel agency at your local mall. But no worry, I don't really need a job I guess, as long as that ticket cost $10 less.

Introducing codeshare at this time is dangerous. All unionized employess work under a labor agreement and once something is negotiated and agreed to, there is little that one can do to change course. If codeshare ends up a net positive for profits, even by a small measure, the labor groups will have to live with their current lot in life at the company. You cannot put the genie back in the bottle. Working holidays, weekends, nights, less productive trips and flying as a co-pilot for extended durations will become the norm as a result of stagnation and no growth. Slowing growth can be an effective tool; but given our financial position and adaptive nature, we should be monopolizing on these rare oppportunities to grab lucrative market share, and backfill where the legacies have started reductions. International flying IS more complicated; however, this is the most productive, innovative, and proven empoyee group in the airline industry. Our company is poised and ready to meet any challenge. Southwest Airlines' management needs to trust its product and its people to deliver.

Aside from the economic and quality of life issues that employees complain about, placing our brand at the feet of many unproven hands has the potential of catastrophically detstroying 37 years of hard work and loyalty. I have had experience with passengers not being accomodated in the same manner on an ATA flight that they were accustomed on Southwest. "Unfortunately, you don't fly to XXXX. ATA is my only alternative and if it weren't for my rapid rewards, I would fly American internationally." This is not what I want to hear from our passengers. Sadly, when you surrender control of you product, you have little choice but to accept the results.

My hope is that SWA will find its moxy and return to the fight. Our travelling futures depend on a healthy and Spirited Southwest. The Southwest we are writing about is healthy, but not as Spirited.

Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm sorry if this was already mentioned, but if we were to ever dream of flying our own planes over the borders, we would be required by the FAA to have a passenger manifest and assigned seating on that flight. The day we buy used DC10's or add a 2nd lavatory in the back of our 737s is the day we will offer assigned seating. It ain't gonna happen kids so give it up.

I've come to the realization that I will never work an international flight of any kind at Southwest and I'm over hoping for it. But, I'd rather work 100% domestic flights with a bit of job security than wake up on a layover in Paris wondering if my airline is going to still be around.

>>>So because they are leased they must not provided a job for you in the GO

Has nothing to do with it. The poster I was responding to linked the retired -300 now sitting on the MX ramp to the supposed job losses that will supposedly result from the latest international codeshare (which, BTW, won't start until at least 2010), and the linkage is flawed--one has nothing to do with the other, which your very own next question confirms:

>>>What has Gary said our net growth might be next year? That's right 0%. So instead of taking our new deliveries and extending the leases on the -300 providing jobs for many people, we are going to return aircraft and grow our route structure through different companies.

I assume that you know how to read a calendar, but if not, that net 0% growth is for next year, 2009 (due to the economy) and not the year after, 2010, when the codeshare starts.

It amazes me how some of you folks can't help but keep comparing apples to oranges, and then wondering why folks disagree with your conclusions, and then have resort to name-calling with those who do disagree.

As I've stated before, I think international code sharing is a smart, cost-effective way for SWA to mitigate the cost risk compared with flying our own metal to these places from Day-1. Codesharing agreements aren't eternal, they can (and do) lapse/expire. That said, if the really wild rumor about Republic taking over some existing domestic short-haul flying ala' what happened at Midwest Express actually does end up coming true, that's a completely different kettle of fish, and I'm right there with you. (Personally, I doubt that rumor will happen). Unlike the angry mobs with pitchforks and burning torches that seem to be ready to storm the castle based on rumors, misinformation, misconceptions, emotions, and fear, I'll wait to see adverse actions have actually taken before I react.

Oh yeah, Gary Kelly indeed isn't Herb, but isn't that the epitome of being a tough act to follow? He's got my support, and why the 5-10 year plan (whatever it is) isn't common knowledge to all employees should be able to be figured out by anyone with a bit of common sense.

John,

I'm not sure if you saw it, but we're already taking losses. Last quarter was our first in 19 years.

And don't forget we've endured other fireworks too: We had a record FAA fine levied against us for lack of basic maintenance oversight by the finance guy now running flight operations. We've witnessed numerous operational meltdowns out on line due to poor staffing during our heaviest holiday travel periods. We now have all major labor contracts now open at the same time. We're losing our shirts right now as a company thanks to a bunch of crazy hedging contracts which were signed this summer at the peak of the energy cycle. And we're selling and deferring aircraft deliveries from Boeing. Remember those Fort airplanes? How much did we pay to buy, overhaul, and significantly modify them only to turn them back for sale only months later.

I mean how hard can this be? As managers, you get handed over the reigns to the most profitable, stable, and debt free airline in the history of the United States and within a matter of just a few years all heck seems to break loose every time the employees turn around.

Take your head out of the sand, and look around you. This is not a union vs. management thing. This is just incompetent management holed up in a bunker called Dallas.

ONCE YOU LOOSE THE UNIONIZED LABOR GROUPS, YOU WILL NEVER GET THEM BACK : (

I wonder if anybody wonders about the Volaris effect (reversed). I have flown Volaris and they have brand-spaking-new state-of-the-art A319's with an impeccable cabin, black leather seats, superb service delivered by elegant Flight Attendants and 3 lavatories! I wonder what customers switching to one of Southwest stinky -300's will think?

Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm sorry if this was already mentioned, but if we were to ever dream of flying our own planes over the borders, we would be required by the FAA to have a passenger manifest and assigned seating on that flight. The day we buy used DC10's or add a 2nd lavatory in the back of our 737s is the day we will offer assigned seating. It ain't gonna happen kids so give it up.

**********

Agree! Is a cultural thing, folks. We don't know how to do it!
My advise: If you really want to fly internationally quit Southwest TODAY. Work for JetBlue or Continental, they are great companies too. It ain't gonna happen. Get Over! Again: No matter what Gary Kelly says in the Message to the Field, HE IS LYING. (to appease you and Wall Street) one more time: SOUTHWEST AIRLINES WILL NEVER FLY INTERNATIONAL. NE-VER, NUNCA, JAMAIS!

Keep up the good work Mr. Kelly. Soon Southwest will be like Delta.

The LUV is gone.

PS: They also have TV's and assigned seating!

response to anonymous "Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm sorry if this was already mentioned, but if we were to ever dream of flying our own planes over the borders, we would be required by the FAA to have a passenger manifest and assigned seating on that flight."

The FAA already requires a passenger manifest or electronic equivalent for domestic flights. ICAO standards do not require seat assignments ( RyanAir has open seating), and I can find no FAA requirements for assigned seats.

With all due respect, I don't care if I ever operate an international flight myself. That's not the point, as our domestic flying can be outsourced even more easily than our international flights.

This sucks but is not a surprise at all. Just another big "SHUT UP!" to all the pilots that start the day with a grin and the "latest scoop": e.g. -We are opening CUN next year, Gary told me or -My brother called me saying that we are putting signs in SJU!... pleeeease, this is a good wake-up call, stop spreading stupid rumors! They don't trust us in Mexico or Puerto Rico! He he

As a shareholder, I'm dismayed that LUV would be content with no or negative growth only to expand the operations of a competitor. Furthermore, as an investor in general, it's sad to see the newly growing competitor to Southwest doesn't even fly Made-in-the-USA aircraft. When the rest of my capital returns to the Market, I'll keep these data points in mind.

>>>So because they are leased they must not provided a job for you in the GO

Has nothing to do with it.

*********
Surprise how did I know that you work in the GO. Yes I understand that we are not retiring THOSE particular aircraft because of THIS particular codeshare, and I realize that nobody is being directly laid off. The apples to apples comparison that you cannot seem to understand while we are growing ZERO which equals about 80 jobs per aircraft (including GO jobs) we choose to use a competitor to grow our route structure (zero GO jobs). I could care less if we ever fly to Canada or Mexico. What I do care about is increasing our presence with our aircraft, and crews. All I hear is that there are so many places that we could fly to here in the US...OK let's do it. How is zero growth while allowing other companies to do fly that we could EASILY do accomplishing that. If not there then where?

What this is is a simple cost effective way to give our future coworkers jobs away to someone who will do it for much cheaper. You are fooling yourself if you think that those jobs are ever going to come back. I have not called you any names, but I think that you need to get out into the real world of this industry that we work in, and give me one good example of an airline that this has been a good things for the employees. That is the real REALITY.

True. Volaris looks "High class" compared to Southwest...

As a shareholder, I'm dismayed that LUV would be content with no or negative growth only to expand the operations of a competitor. Furthermore, as an investor in general, it's sad to see the newly growing competitor to Southwest doesn't even fly Made-in-the-USA aircraft. When the rest of my capital returns to the Market, I'll keep these data points in mind.

As I see there was a post directed at me I will respond.

I do not for one minute pretend to be an expert at business modeling a profitable airline. I know for a fact that most, if not all, other US airlines lose money by the boatloads and move in and out of bankruptcy seemingly every year. SWA has been the exception to the rule so management must have done something right through the years. Maybe that was Herb. Maybe that's not Gary. I don't know any of these people personally and am not in a position to judge their talents. I am simply saying that if a business cannot enter a new venture profitably than it shouldn't do it. If it does, everyone's existing job is at risk.

Those of you who strongly believe that international expansion via your own metal is the way to go may be absolutely right. Your management seems to think otherwise. Maybe they are right. I'm just glad that SWA is looking for ways to serve me, the customer, so I don't have to buy that American Airlines ticket.

Wonder if Volaris hires US citizens... Mmmmm. I should go to work for them and fly International. How exciting!!!! Volaris hire me! I'm a good Flight Attendant! I can work an international flight!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This employee just lost that loving feeling.

Chris

My company is planning to put its passengers on a foreign carrier with TWO years experience as an airline!!?? YIKES!!!
What will Southwest's exposure be if this start-up airline has an incident? Can they have a substantial track record after only two years? How is their maintenance? Are their crews qualified? I would be very, very, very leery of buying a ticket on a foreign, start-up airline--much less linking my future to them.
Too bad we apparently can't figure out how to grow our company into these destinations ourselves!

It's just about the gates at Midway!! Trust us!!

"I'm not sure if you saw it, but we're already taking losses. Last quarter was our first in 19 years"
False. Our profit was 69 million. There will be profitsharing on this. This "loss" was paper only and related to the devaluation of the hedges.
"Remember those Fort airplanes? How much did we pay to buy, overhaul, and significantly modify them only to turn them back for sale only months later. "
False. The ford airplanes are still in the fleet. 270 and 271 have been reconfigured and 550 and 551 will be done later.
"We're losing our shirts right now as a company thanks to a bunch of crazy hedging contracts which were signed this summer at the peak of the energy cycle. "
False again
look at the 10q report for the facts on the hedging values. You have our contracts confused with someone elses.

The stock is soaring to $10 on this monumental announcement.
I wonder how much money our esteemed management leaders have invested in WestJet and Volaris?
SWA is dead. Anybody know the telephone number of that truck driving school?

If you guys think I'm going to trust my family's lives to a Mexican airline that has been flying for all of two years than you really are NUTS!

Gary is violating an agreement with the pilots, selling another carriers flights on the SWA website.

It's about violating the trust he seems to feel is irrelevant in making a few marginal dollars.

Not one GO employee will suffer a paycut that EVERY Flight Attendant and Pilot will take as SWA slows growth, and cuts capacity. This is the difference, the frontline employee taking it in the shorts so the folks in the GO can continue having spirit parties. Thats why parking jets is a bad idea.

Its like I told my ex-husband when I gave up on him, "I know you gotta good heart but you lied, you went with another, and you came home with a disease that's hurt us both."

Gary honey, you got a disease and I'm afraid in the airline union world, there ain't always a cure. You made your bed sweetie, but I know you still got a good heart deep down.

I am overwhelmingly concerned. I'd hoped to be at SWA for 25 + years, but it's starting to look like it (SWA) won't be around for that long. This is the beginning of the destruction of "that legendary Southwest culture" and potentially the entire company. I have no faith in this decision because it's the wrong one, but I do have faith that someone can turn this around! Let US go to Mexico! Let US go to Canada! If those companies can grow 15%+ a year on our backs I think we can take advantage of the same situation and do the job ourselves much better, especially to Mex and Can. Obviously there is opportunity there! I hope we can get together and realize WE ARE the best, most efficient, and most profitable airline out there and WE should be taking care of business, instead of farming out our name and product and guaranteing 'positively outrageous service' on a start-up Mexican airline that's 2 years old with no track record on aviation safety, service, or business.
Let's actually get back to what Southwest Airlines does best!!!

Rest in Peace: "Treat the employee well, they treat the customer well, and in-turn, the share holders are made happy!" This mantra has been turned on its head. This airline is all about the return on investment and SHORT TERM share holder profits.

This isn't your Father's airline anymore.

I would not let my family fly on Volaris if the tickets were free. They will be riskier than Southwest PERIOD!

From what it looks like, they have a very nice product with (what a concept) professional looking flight attendant uniforms and flip down video screens...and most likely, assigned seating. At least we chose to team up with what looks to be a nice carrier. Copy and paste this link and scroll down for cabin photos:

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/...

Quote
"This is the difference, the frontline employee taking it in the shorts so the folks in the GO can continue having spirit parties. "

And parades

Somebody should send a transcript of this blog to Wall Street and the press, so they know how we really feel about this crap!

In theory we can code-share every future destination, because there is always going to be another airline willing to do it cheaper and take all the risks, do the paperwork, etc. I guess that we are planning to live off our website and good reputation for years to come... Take notice Wall Street !

I predict that our stock is going to hit the $5 mark within weeks...

Quote
"Volaris looks "High class" compared to Southwest"

And your point is?
So does Jet Blue, American, Delta, United, etc. Must be because of all the profits they made the last few years. Oh wait, they haven't made money in years...

My bad

Bottom line here is that no airline employee wants to see another airline struggle or employees lose their jobs, the issue at hand is the outsourcing of travel to another airline
when Southwest employees are more than capable of doing the job. Seniority has already stagnated due to zero growth which has turned short term quality of life issues into long term quality of life issues for pilots and flight attendants.

FOFL
First Officer For Life

>>>Somebody should send a transcript of this blog to Wall Street and the press, so they know how we really feel about this crap!

Brilliant idea. Notwithstanding the fact that the relative handful of negative comments here do not automatically translate into being the opinions of 30,000 employees, the media will assume they do and report that. When the stock declines due to reports of "labor discord", everyone here will act surprised, and blame that decline on Gary too....

Well, I'm the optimist of the bunch. Let's start a group and come up with creative and cost efficient solutions to this dilemma and offer it to Gary. If we put our hearts and minds into this we can be teaching Airtran, Frontier, JetBlue, Spirit and even Ryanair how to work and deliver an awesome low-cost international product within a year! Let's do it!

I got nada against our dear friends south of the border. But we're the (bleep) airline when it comes to airlines and all of a sudden we're gonna put our mayonnaise on someone else's sandwich? Not this tired old momma, I'm sorry.

Those of you with the "testing the waters" theory make me chuckle. Do you really think that Southwest Airlines (specially Kelly) after seeing how he can turn a quick profit (with so little risk and effort) is going to enter those markets with our metal? Y'all are on crack! This is the end of "Southwest, the real airline" and the beginning of the "Virtual Southwest". It has been discussed even in the WSJ the "doing more with less" doctrine is here to stay. You are now working for a travel agency... get used to it!

When do the next round of "early retirement" starts? I'm ready to go to work for Continental and fly destinations that matter! Buh bye....

The saddest part of this tragedy is that the great mayority of our employees are soooooo brainwashed they believe every word management utters. They are clueless, just repeating the slogans they heard in the msg to the field like parrots! They are CONVINCED that these code-share outsourcing is the best thing ever!

Hi Gary, Mike (our ATA hero!), and Laura,

What happens if this type of anger makes it to the analyst community? I hold a lot of ESPP stock. A lot. I am an avid investor and something here has me very alarmed. I've noticed that when a previous high flyer falls from grace in the investment community, it is rare that it redeems itself. I'm talking here of the Ciscos, Walmarts, and GEs. So I'm asking you is this marginal codeshare revenue really worth the loss of your employee groups and how much money have you budgeted in your analysis for a backlash? See what I mean?

This is a sad, sad day.

Let's see, ATA used to fly to DEN, RSW, SFO, and MSP....and now where does SWA fly to? DEN,RSW,SFO, and soon MSP. This is not outsourcing...no jobs are being sacrificed. In fact, jobs are being added to be able to administer the codeshare.

And folks...don't be fooled....this is one or two people wrting these negative posts....there can't be that many dumb people out there that can't see how this is a good thing for SWA and it's employees and Customers.

The time is coming, this company will burn down to the ground because of the greed for green. I will not stand to see my occupation outsourced to the lowest bidder. Gary Kelly and his puppets in mgt may get their millions but "failure to communicate" will be there reputation.

I don"t understand why Southwest Airlines can not fly its own aircraft to Mexico. Airtran, Jetblue, Spirit, Frontier and Alaska all fly there. I am sure it was a big risk for them too but they did it. Also how about more bussiness centers like ATL, BOS, CLT, NYC, MEM, MKE, RIC would be nice to generate more revenue.

Wow, I am amazed at all the negative comments about the codeshare. This is really shocking that employees are just up in arms about this and are slinging mud left and right. All i can say is wow. Your company needs to get it together...stop bickering, come to the table, work out the differences. I want to continue flying your great airline...these squabbles makes me start to think that you're going the wAAy of American Airlines with their sour management-labor relations.

And this is just the beginning folks! Hawaii and the Caribbean are next... Then sky is the limit! Check this out:
DALLAS — Southwest Airlines is taking steps into international service by announcing a deal to sell travel to Mexico in 2010 with partner Volaris, a well-financed Mexican carrier that is just two years old.
Southwest has already said it would team with WestJet to offer U.S.-Canada travel by late 2009.
Southwest executives are overseeing a technology makeover that will modernize its reservations system to handle more international travel. They are talking to other carriers about service to Hawaii and the Caribbean.
Competitors are paying close attention. Some may fear that Southwest Airlines could emerge as a low-cost rival on their lucrative international routes, just as it pushed beyond Texas and grew into the nation's largest carrier by number of domestic passengers.
Others are courting Southwest. Last month, the chief executive of AirTran Airways said he would like to talk to Southwest about selling seats on each other's planes and sharing the revenue.
Such arrangements are called code-sharing, because one airline puts its name or code on a flight operated by the other.
Code-sharing is considered a low-risk way for airlines to expand their networks without the added cost of more planes and employees. It figures to be a particularly important strategy for Southwest, which is alone among the nation's major carriers in not belonging to one of three big global alliances or teams of airlines.
Go-it-alone Southwest's first foray into code-sharing was an afterthought — part of a move to expand at Chicago's Midway Airport in 2004. Southwest acquired six gates that had been controlled by ATA Airlines in exchange for making a cash infusion into ATA and beginning a marketing joint venture.
Southwest said it took in $50 million in revenue from the code-sharing deal in 2005. An extra benefit — the best part of the deal for some travelers — was that Southwest customers could cash in frequent-flier points for free trips on ATA to Hawaii, which Southwest does not serve.
Soon Southwest was considering expanding the partnership to include selling seats on ATA flights to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. But ATA weakened and cut flights. It filed for bankruptcy and stopped flying in April. Undeterred by ATA's demise, Southwest's interest in code-sharing possibilities grew.
The timing for such agreements is also important.
Since 2001, Southwest has enjoyed fortress-like strength in the troubled U.S. airline industry, earning consistent profits because it bet right on the direction of oil prices several years ago.
But the castle walls are showing cracks.
Last month, Southwest reported its first quarterly loss since early 1991. Its wildly successful fuel-hedging bets are winding down and losing value. Its once enormous financial advantage over other airlines is shrinking.
To avoid big losses or draconian spending cuts, Southwest must raise more money — and fast.
The airline aims to increase revenue by $1.5 billion, and international code-sharing could contribute "several hundred million dollars" a year toward that goal, said CEO Gary Kelly.
In July, Southwest announced that by the end of 2009 it would launch service between the U.S. and Canada with WestJet Airlines. Details such as destinations, fares and revenue forecasts have not been disclosed.
Southwest officials say they have been talking to nearly a dozen airlines about code-sharing to Hawaii, Mexico and the Caribbean by late 2009 — Europe and Asia would be farther down the road.
"We want to start off regionally. It's simpler," said Richard Sweet, who leads a group at Southwest that is studying code-sharing possibilities.
"WestJet comes pretty close to the profile of an ideal code-sharing partner," Sweet said. He said both WestJet and Southwest are low-cost, efficient, and emphasize customer service.
Like Southwest, WestJet flies only Boeing 737 aircraft and its reservations system runs on the same technology from Sabre Airline Solutions, which Sweet said was a plus. And both have only one class of service — no separate first-class cabins.
Sweet said travelers will be able to buy WestJet tickets on southwest.com this year, even before the code-sharing deal starts.
Volaris differs from WestJet — and Southwest — in some ways, including its fleet, which consists entirely of Airbus jets. But it is also a low-cost carrier that hopes to capitalize on consolidation taking place in the Mexican airline industry.
Kelly said the deal opens up attractive Mexican destinations to Southwest customers. Volaris flies to 23 cities in Mexico, from border cities to beach resorts including Cancun and Puerto Vallarta.
With deals done for Canada and Mexico, Southwest will turn now to finding partners to serve Hawaii and the Caribbean.
Sweet and Kelly declined to discuss potential partners, but industry experts all have their own favorites.
At the top of the list for several was Hawaiian Airlines, to replace service lost when ATA went under.
"Hawaiian would be the obvious choice for Southwest," said Robert Mann, an independent airline consultant in Port Washington, New York. "In the absence of Aloha" — which failed this year — "it's the dominant carrier in the islands."
Mann said Southwest could team with AirTran or Spirit Airlines to sell seats to the Caribbean, although Spirit "is even more bare-bones of an operation than Southwest by a long stretch."
Whoever it picks, Mann said, partners will insist that Southwest begin assigning passengers to seats to match the practice of other airlines. Southwest considered such a move last year but stuck with its open-seating plan in which those who check in first get the best seats.
George Hamlin, managing director of ACA Associates, an aviation consulting firm in Northern Virginia, said Alaska Airlines could open up flights to Hawaii and Mexico.
Some analysts said Southwest and WestJet could be the start of an alliance among low-cost carriers in the Western hemisphere, perhaps including a low-cost South American carrier such as Brazil's Gol.
"It's exciting that the LCC (low-cost carrier) sector finally is thinking about international service," said William Swelbar, a former director at Hawaiian who now runs an airline data project at MIT. "WestJet is the first step. We'll see fares to Canada come down ... that's always good for consumers."
Kelly has said Southwest wants to sell seats to Europe after 2010. Analysts said Irish discount carrier Ryanair and its U.K. rival, EasyJet, are logical partners.

I can't believe we are going to fly our customers to some gateway like Phoenix, sell them a ticket, and put them on some third world startup airline and send them on their merry way. Herb, are you watching this? You are still a board member aren't you? Save us from this guy!

Outsourcing the jobs of the most productive work force in the airline business. We miss the loyalty to the employee groups that Herb brought to the table. What happened to "treat your employees as the customer"?

I dont understand why Southwest Airline can not fly to Mexico using its own aircraft. Airtran, Jetblue, Spirit, Frontier, and Alaska fly to Mexico and Airtran, Jetblue, Spirit, fly to the Caribbean and do it very well under it own brand. I am sure it was a big risk to them too but they did it. Also how about more business center like ATL, CLT, BOS, NYC, RIC, MKE, to cater to more business select Customers to gain more revenue that would be a nice plus. Just my two cents.

I realize the flying public aren't aware of the "ins" and "outs" of the industry and can't understand why there is such a negative groundswell of emotion regarding this codeshare agreement.

Think of it in these terms. If you had a job where seniority determines not only your pay, but your quality of life and your company decided to stop all promotions and instead, give positions away to people at another company when you, yourself were not only extremely capable, but probably more experienced at the job. This, in turn causes your position to stagnate for an undetermined amount of time, with only more of the same to come, are you going to be happy about it?

While codeshare affects all Southwest employees as a whole, the flight attendants and pilots will bare the brunt of it in terms of schedules, seniority, and quality of life because of
outsourcing rather than growth and the benefits that growth bring to the Southwest work force, which is, and always has been an asset to Southwest Airlines.

It's a slap in the face of employees and I'm afraid turning the other cheek will only bring another slap with more codeshare agreements in the not too distant future.

This isn't an "anti-Volaris" post, it's a "pro-employee" post.

And you guys didn't know this was going on? Why everybody is so surprised all of the sudden?

And folks...don't be fooled....this is one or two people wrting these negative posts....there can't be that many dumb people out there that can't see how this is a good thing for SWA and it's employees and Customers.

*********
Oooops! Somebody is in an alarming state of denial! One or two people writing over 200 posts? I don't think so.

Yes, Oliver, that's what we're worried about too! You see, we have a new CEO that is more worried about the bottom line than about his employees. That is something previously unknown at Southwest.

I see a lot of jumping the gun attitude. Be glad that you guys have a job right now and that your airline is not as bad as the next one in Dallas. As much as I would like to see Southwest fly internationally, it's just not a decent option at the current moment. Now 5, 10 years down the road, I would be good money that you will see Southwest metal flying to international cities.
As much as I can understand you guys and gals feeling as if you have been betrayed by management, remember that this is public, and those that don't fully understand the airline industry will not understand what your line of thinking is or why you think that this is a bad thing.
Let it work itself out guys, be patience. Too many times in our society today we want things now and, "Why can't I be rewarded" attitude. The old days are gone, as much fun as they were, we as a group need to change our line of thinking. Practice patience everyone, be glad for what you have received for today, and humble yourself with that, for tomorrow will bring bigger, and better things to you and to this airline.

Joseph R. Meyers

Dallas, Texas

I don't understand why Southwest Airlines can not fly to Mexico using it own aircraft. Airtran, Jetblue, Spirit, Frontier and Alaska plus all legacy carriers all fly to Mexico using its own brand and do it very well. Also Airtran, Spirit, Jetblue fly to the Caribbean using its own AIrcraft and flt crews and they keep adding to their caribbean and mexcian destinations while Southwest just sits back and wants to just do a codeshare. I am sure it was a big risk for them but they did it. and thier growing thier caribbean and mexico destinations. Also how about more business center like ATL, CLT, NYC, BOS, MEM, MKE, RIC, to cater to more business select flyers and generate more business flyer revenues for Southwest.

Sorry my post came out three times I could not get it to go through the first two times but I guess it did sorry about that I luv SWA.

This is truly a sad day in my professional career. Reading all these posts along with the hundreds of posts on the SWAPA website has made it abundantly clear this is the beginning of the end of Southwest Airlines. Every company has a select few complainers but there have been vocal angry pilots who have never said a peep about anything for years and years.

I don't know the answers to codeshare. If it's possible for SWA to make a profit or not but I am sure the culture of this airline is dying. I've never seen so much anger and discontent before. I always thought getting to SWA meant job security but I'm going to start polishing up my resume. Not because codesharing puts another airline in the mix but because this codesharing business is destroying employees perception of what SWA means.

Whomever reads this for the executives really needs to step up and show Gary and Colleen these posts.

This is terrible...

No bueno, I don't like this codeshare... Europe, Asia, and even Hawaii are easy to understand, but north and south are easy picking for Southwest to do themselves. Things that make you go, hmmmm....

While I wish Southwest could fly to these great destinations with thier own aircraft and flt crews. I do know Southwest has been good to its employees. where you do not have to worry about layoffs and paycuts like some of the other airlines. Hopifully one day Southwest will fly these routes themselfs once they get established on the codeshare routes and see that they can make money on them. Maybe they are testing the waters first. I do think the codeshare is better than nothing. The only thing I worry about is the other LCC getting a foot hold on the routes first before SWA can do it them selfs. just my two cents.

Im with cflightattendant we are all a team. I wish everyone would take a deep breath we will all be OK. Its very upsetting to hear all these nagative comments on this post. lets work together.

I too am a concerned employee. When the announcement was first made, I naturally was concerned about my future with regards to quality of life, pay, and upgrade time. After reading this blog, I'm more concerned about the culture of Southwest being flushed down the drain. It seems that management has failed to consider the effects of marginalizing their front line employees. I sure hope someone in management is paying attention to this because if we lose the goodwill of the internal customer, the external customer's will soon follow. The only thing that keeps the public coming back is a cheap ticket, efficient operations, and our hospitality. To sacrifice this winning formula for codeshare revenue seems foolish. I may not know how to run an airline but I believe there are plenty examples on how not to. Let's not head down that road.

I too am a concerned employee. When the announcement was first made, I naturally was concerned about my future with regards to quality of life, pay, and upgrade time. After reading this blog, I'm more concerned about the culture of Southwest being flushed down the drain. It seems that management has failed to consider the effects of marginalizing their front line employees. I sure hope someone in management is paying attention to this because if we lose the goodwill of the internal customer, the external customer's will soon follow. The only thing that keeps the public coming back is a cheap ticket, efficient operations, and our hospitality. To sacrifice this winning formula for codeshare revenue seems foolish. I may not know how to run an airline but I believe there are plenty examples on how not to. Let's not head down that road.

I wonder if the CEO at Volaris is a University of Texas Grad. Doesn't seem like you have to be qualified anymore to run things at SWA, just need to be a UT grad. Move your cars folks, we need some more parking on the South side of the GO for reserved parking for the new V.P's.

Sell your stock now. The ship is sinking under the weight of the Peter Principle.

Wow! I must say as a frequent loyal customer of SWA, I am in shock regarding the uproar this codeshare has started. I was pretty excited about it until I started reading this blog. I love flying you guys because of your employees; always smiling and courteous. I am afraid that this codesharing business is not going to go over very well with the employee group! Please don't turn this fantastic airline into a Delta or American! Your customer service is what keeps me coming back, but with angry employees you will be just like the rest of 'em.

Good luck!

For the people who are saying that Southwest should fly their own metal to Canada and Mexico. You are NUTS!!! With the economy in the dumps right now. It would be a BIG mistake to try this right now. I'm no CEO or anything close but, I have worked in retail my entire life. In the 90's I used to work at a Midwest retailer called Venture stores Inc. We had approx 100 in 7 states with the majority in MO, IN, and IL. The company tried to expand well past their operating capacity. They went full steam into Texas with approx 25 new stores in 2 years. The following is copied from Wikipedia.

By the late 1990s, the chain found that it was unable to compete against other retail chains, such as Wal-Mart, Target, and Kmart. Venture tried to return to its founding principles as an upscale discounter and remodeled most of its 90+ stores. While facing vast competition Venture made a fatal mistake trying to expand into Texas instead of protecting its core markets. Venture sold the Texas stores to Kmart in 1996 and closed its distribution center in Corsicana, Texas. The company entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 20, 1998, and tried to operate with a smaller number of stores. The effort was not successful, and the company announced its closing on April 27, 1998. Most of the former Venture buildings were absorbed into other chains, such as Kmart, Kohl's, ShopKo, and Burlington Coat Factory.

Now with that said. Does any employee want to over expand and end up in financial trouble?
Lets just say SWA did fly their own metal into these two countries and failed. In order to not layoff any employees (even after 9/11 they NEVER laid off a single employee) they decided to eliminate the FREE airfare and instead charge $25 for a round trip flight. How would you feel then???? And to the others that are blaming Gary Keller on the drop in the LUV stock. That is completely outrageous. EVERY stock is down right now. The last thing you would want to do right now is to sell your stock because you already absorbed the loss and when the stock climbs back up you'll be out of luck. Get your heads out of the toilet and realize that this is the best way to test the market with little consequence if it doesn't work.

I guess that the good news is that a customer will be able to get on a WestJet airplane in Calgary, fly nonstop to Phoenix, and change planes onto a Volaris aircraft to destinations all over Mexico. Somebody explain to me once again why this is such a great thing?

Volaris is a great airline, I flew them a few times in Mexico. Brand new airplanes and a great attitude of the staff - many (Not southwest) mainline US airlines could learn from these guys' service!

Not excited :(
I'm concerned that Southwest has lost it's edge by outsourcing jobs and growth opportunities that would greatly benefit the employees that made Southwest what it is today. The company is losing it's vision as a leader in the transportation industry by adding codeshare partners to fly to routes they could easily fly to, and IMO, LUV's low share price reflects that lack of confidence by Wall Street and individual investors. I do not think that the flying public will be very excited to fly on an airline that is less than 3 years old, without a proven safety record, that an overwhelming majority of folks have not even heard of.

Southworst Airlines are the worst airlines that don't offer services on THEIR planes to Canada, Caribbean, and Hawaii!!!

I'm very disappointed with this announcement. So many customers hated the ATA codeshare, were stranded when the company went out of business and felt they diluted our wonderful product. WestJet and now a no-name in Mexico called Volaris? What is Mr. Kelly thinking?

I love and trust our pilots and flight attendants and their safety record and customer service record is second to no one else. It is a slap in the face to us loyal employees to outsource our work to Canada and Mexico and then infer that we are incapable of performing the work ourselves. SHAME ON YOU!!!

For those who don't understand why the pilots would be so upset... keep in mind we are operating under a contract signed in 1994. That contract and all of it's extensions became amendable - ended - in August 2006. Since that point, the pilots have been under what is essentially a pay freeze. Now (for the first time) the company has essentially eliminated all growth and prospects for advancement in seniority. Couple that with contracting these outside carriers who are projecting growth rates of 25-50% while carrying "Southwest" passengers.

While the company is having no problems throwing parties at the GO and promoting VP's, those who are out there serving the customers day in and day out seem to have lost the respect of the GO staff.

It really is just another job after all.

Way to pimp the SWA brand!!!! Nothing like hitching your wagon to an unproven, 2-year old Mexican airline!!
SWA flinches at allowing their logo to be used in certain public events for fear of the effect on the "Southwest Brand"..... one of the most powerful brand names in the country. What are you thinking hooking up with these unknown clowns..... is it really that hard to fly to Mexico yourself?

Many of you who post these negative comments must have forgotten about the ATA codeshare and what Southwest did after ATA went under. How about our flights to Florida that we found profitable AFTER we codeshared with ATA. Now we're into West Palm Beach making that profit ourselves. Trust management and let's just test those waters to see where they take us. Codesharing is a far more reasonable option in these turbulent times!

What a train wreck and why didn't the Company see this coming. Never ignore your employee groups early concerns. Never. Now Dallas has signed these deals, and labor's anger is clearly accelerating. I've been around the industry for a while now. There is no reeducation which will fix this. It will get worse with every new agreement and much worse when the actual foreign 737s start showing up on Southwest's gates. A daily reminder of a shrinking airline and "outsourcing" which will strike close to home. Dallas didn't think this through. This will destroy the culture I'm afraid.

Flight Attendant here and some points should be made. I think a lot of this posting is being done by a few people as someone said. But I can tell you that these views are radical from our flight crews. Especially the pilots I hear this mentioned a lot. I think its more of an issue for the pilots but that seems to be changing. I do not think the pilots will step down. I've never seen them this angry or heard them talk about slowdowns, etc. before yesterday. But I think this blog is pathetic.

Great to learn about the international expansion! Please continue. I often travel to Brazil for business. Any thought about an alliance with TAM or other Brazilian airlines? I hope so.

The posted a very small blip about codeshare this morning but it doesn't even reference employee concerns. Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead Gary? - HOU F/A

Future Southwest employee in the hiring waiting pool: I hope you don't get hired! (you sound pretty mentally unstable to me). NO MORE CODESHARES!

We went to West Palm Beach before the ATA codeshare, get your facts straight. Never trust management when they are going after your career. SWA is not in trouble and turbulent times are when we are at our best. This is the time to take over some other destinations with our own employees. Enough is enough, Gary has driven the knife into his employees hearts. Too sad.

Quote:
Now we're into West Palm Beach making that profit ourselves. Trust management and let's just test those waters to see where they take us. Codesharing is a far more reasonable option in these turbulent times!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Gasp) We were in PBI before the ATA deal, thankyuverymuch!

I agree with roosterman, this is pimping the Southwest brand! Now I know the secret of your success: Incapability to take risks like everybody else and a total disdain for international markets. Your airline these days looks like is run by Sarah Palin.

Southwest is in trouble! Why can a 2 year old unproven Mexican startup do what SWA is afrid to do??
Isn't Southwest supposed to be a leader and an innovator? Outsourcing potentially lucrative flying is a joke! When I buy a ticket on Southwest to the US, Canada, or Mexico, I want to FLY ON SOUTHWEST!

OMG, I AM SOOO FREAKING OUT OVER THIS!! I am SOOO mad at you pilots. What is wrong with you? We're going to Mexico!! And if you ask me, its about time Gary took on some of the unions at Southwest. It is SOOO out of control with you guys. You DO NOT own this airline. You're just a little employee just like me. Because the unions make SO much money there's nothing left for us here in Dallas and we DO work hard. So pooh on you guys. And as far as dissing on our young Mexican friends and their pilots well news flash from Reggie, your job isn't all that hard. How do I know? Because I just got a PPL this summer and passed my written exam with a 96%, whoo hoo!!! And I'm not alone, some of my friends here got there's too and we all agree you have a fun job but it isn't really so hard. So boo, hoo, hoo. Cry me a river, I'm going to Mexico cry babies and I'm standing behind my man Gary!! Go Gary and viva la Mexico!!!! Whooo, hooooo!!!!!!!!

Paula, Brian and the Blog team,

WoW... I'm impressed by you guys and girls! managing the blog over the last day must've been mayhem! :o|

To all the posters, do bear in mind that the Blog is moderated for unsuitable language, outside of that, I've never seen any negative comment not allowed though in the last two years, so there is no doubt as to the integrity of what the blog team is doing, they're letting all comments (aside from downright abusive and inappropriate!) through!

If your comment doesn't go through immediately, it is because the team have to give it the once over to ensure it is not grossly inappropriate... imagine how much work that's been! (AND the team also has other jobs to do at the same time... WoW! I guess that's multitasking for you!)

Ref the SWA codeshare with Volaris, I have to say that:
a) I'm initially rather happy to see that SWA will be able to offer flights to Mexico, even in a codeshare
b) I'm surprised at the number of concerned posts by SWA employees

I guess there isn't quite enough information out there to really make my mind up, although it seems logical today to consider a codeshare with a Mexican operator that can provide a large number of destinations and routings that interconnect with the SWA network, much like the WestJet partnership.

I will follow what comes out closely over the next few days before deciding wether there's any reason to feel cautious or concerned about this news!
:o)

Raphael

Any of you koolaid drinking employees care to explain how Westjet and Volaris can make oodles of money and grow double digit proportions doing the cross boarder thing yet according to Gary we cannot? I didn't think so...

I think Gary is doing a great job, and I have a lot of faith in his leadership. With the crazy circumstances of the last decade, name another carrier that has weathered this storm as well? So many comments have been critical of our leadership, but I fail to see where they have steered us so wrong. As for flying our own metal and crews on international routes or not “trusting our own Employees” – no one is saying we can’t or won’t some day, only that this is the most prudent route at this juncture. And things change. If there's anything we know about this business it's that things change. Yes, other airlines are doing it, but how profitably? My guess is that one of the reasons they are doing it is because they can’t compete with us on more domestic routes. If you’re so envious of their position, perhaps you should go work for them. Oh, wait, they’re not hiring. Honestly, you all sound like ignorant, insolent brats. I am very thankful that it’s Gary Kelly running this company, and not some of you.

Just depressing. Code share could work but this feels like capitulating on near international routes. Once the others establish routes across the lower 48 boundaries, then I consider it unlikely that we will establish our own. It's our trusted brand, Boeing jets, and highly regarded employees. We should be delivering our customers to these B737-700 capable international population centers. We need the plan. We need the future committment. It could work well, if we are providing much of the trans border transportation. C'mon Mannn!!!

Quote...
OMG, I AM SOOO FREAKING OUT OVER THIS!! I am SOOO mad at you pilots. What is wrong with you? We're going to Mexico!! And if you ask me, its about time Gary took on some of the unions at Southwest. It is SOOO out of control with you guys. You DO NOT own this airline. You're just a little employee just like me. Because the unions make SO much money there's nothing left for us here in Dallas and we DO work hard. So pooh on you guys. And as far as dissing on our young Mexican friends and their pilots well news flash from Reggie, your job isn't all that hard. How do I know? Because I just got a PPL this summer and passed my written exam with a 96%, whoo hoo!!! And I'm not alone, some of my friends here got there's too and we all agree you have a fun job but it isn't really so hard. So boo, hoo, hoo. Cry me a river, I'm going to Mexico cry babies and I'm standing behind my man Gary!! Go Gary and viva la Mexico!!!! Whooo, hooooo!!!!!!!!

You might want to apply at Volaris as a pilot with that 96%, and I'd cut back on being a spokesperson for the GO, you're not doing them any favors.

>>>Any of you koolaid drinking employees care to explain how Westjet and Volaris can make oodles of money and grow double digit proportions doing the cross boarder thing yet according to Gary we cannot? I didn't think so...

You didn't think hard enough. Westjet and Volaris haven't been around all that long (especially Volaris) so do you suppose that their *not* having 20+ year employees on the payroll (with their higher wage rates) just might have something to do with their overall cost structure?

Look, I can understand the fact that pilot contract negotiations have been going on for 2 years and that many are frustrated because of it (I would be too), but the spaming of this board (and others) with what amounts to be electronic informational picketing rhetoric might feel good as a venting mechanism, but it's counterproductive in many ways.

I'd submit that Gary Kelly et. al. know what they're doing, and have facts, figures, and other information (that rank-and-file employees do not) on which to predicate decisions upon. Am I a Kool-aid drinker? Hardly---I'm not at all shy about voicing contrarian opinions, but I'm also not dellusional in thinking that I'm the guy charged with the responsibility of running the Company. Overnighting at a Holiday In Express qualify anyone either.

(..and no, I'm not in management, I'm a union member just like most SWA employees.)

Quoting "Reggie":
I'm going to Mexico cry babies and I'm standing behind my man Gary!! Go Gary and viva la Mexico!!!! Whooo, hooooo!!!!!!!!

********

You know what, you are NOT going to Mexico. Volaris is. You are not. You are not. You are not....

PS: I'm not a pilot and I hate it too!

Honestly, you all sound like ignorant, insolent brats. I am very thankful that it’s Gary Kelly running this company, and not some of you.

**********

You sound pretty pathetic and self-righteous yourself....

Hey Reggie,
You're right...... flying a cessna 152 in the pretty sunshine is exactly like flying a boeing 737 in the sleet and snow.... that's why we just hire any clown with a pilot's license right off the street!! Why don't you post again when you meet the MINIMUM requirements to apply as a pilot at SWA.... I expect to hear back from you in about 7-10 years

Just depressing. Code share could work but this feels like capitulating on near international routes. Once the others establish routes across the lower 48 boundaries, then I consider it unlikely that we will establish our own. It's our trusted brand, Boeing jets, and highly regarded employees. We should be delivering our customers to these B737-700 capable international population centers. We need the plan. We need the future committment. It could work well, if we are providing much of the trans border transportation. C'mon Mannn!!!

Mick — Wed, 11/12/2008 - 11:28

******************

Quoting Mick

Agree 101%

Judas Iscariot sold out Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.

Southwest management upped the ante when they sold out the Southwest Airlines brand name for 39 routes south of the border.

**Because I just got a PPL this summer and passed my written exam with a 96%, whoo hoo!!! And I'm not alone, some of my friends here got there's too and we all agree you have a fun job but it isn't really so hard. So boo, hoo, hoo.***

I love this post. If our jobs are so easy to do and get, and we make so much money, and have so much fun, why are you not flying planes for a living?

The bottom line is that this decision does not affect you, except that maybe you get to fly to Mexico. We ask the questions because we are generally concerned about our company, the product quality and yes our job growth. Why should we not go to Mexico with the safest most experience pilots in the world? No one has more experience flying 737s than we do. So instead we choose to go to Mexico with a two year old airline that currently does not fly to the US?
The ATA codeshare was reported as profitable, but how much did we really make when they went out of business and we had to get people back from their destinations? How much goodwill did we lose when their destinations disappeared off our schedule? If we want to have a true code share lets actually code share mutually, where we go to Mexico from some destinations using Volaris gates in Mexico, and they come to some of our destinations. That is a code share, this is just out-sourcing jobs.

First of all if we were doing what wew are supposed to be doing, get bags from point A to point B baggage, and answering our calls in Customer friendly way, Maybe the Company would give us more to do, but if we can't handle what we have and do a good job at it, Why bother giving us more??? I mean come on. We need to step up to the plate and stop saying "What's in it for me" and take care of the company that is trying to take care of us. If we all came in and did our jobs that way we should be doing them, then i think we wouls be better off and ready to take on more. Just sayin!

AMEN! Bird on a tree, tell them like it is.

Quote:
"If we want to have a true code share lets actually code share mutually, where we go to Mexico from some destinations using Volaris gates in Mexico, and they come to some of our destinations. That is a code share, this is just out-sourcing jobs."
Anonymous — Wed, 11/12/2008 - 12:38

* * *

Hallelujah! This summarizes everything. Agree with every word. Frame it! That's a REAL code share... BOTH AIRLINES doing the flying. The rest is OUTSOURCING. Wake up!!!!!

REGINALD SAYS: I AM going to Mexico my little man. I just got back from lunch and the rumor in my department is that pass bureau deals are a coming. They're coming, they're coming, they're coming!!!! So yes, Southwest employees and their families and partners ARE going to go to Mexico. And if you ask Reggie, I'll feel more than safe without one of you overpaid cry babies driving the bus. Viva La Southwest and Viva El Gordo Gary!!! Whooo, Hoooo!!!!!!!!!!! : ))))))

Reggie,
Step away from the Kool-aid vat. First, congratulations on passing your PPL exam by 96%. You're well on your way. Now get back to me when you have about 12 years of professional or military experience under your belt. That's the AVERAGE for the SWA pilot new hire. Don't forget to buy your own type rating. And that when you do upgrade to a captain spot you get to put your career on the line in front of a FAA designated medical examiner every six months AND you get to take a check ride once a year. Go sit in on a couple of sim sessions to see how much fun it is.

My biggest concern is the dilution of our brand. I think Mr. Kelly is making big mistake. Bigger than the one he made with ATA. He's destroying the great relationship he has with the employee group that brought him to the prom.

Our stock hit the single digit mark today. 9 bucks. Keep announcing code-shares! party is over my friends....

This is really great news! I'm sorry to see that so many are raining on the parade. It's pretty naive of the people on here to keep making these same flawed points over and over again despite refutations which you seem to simply ignore if they carry any real weight. The airline is NOT shrinking(you haven't dropped any cities), you added Denver last year and Minneapolis is coming in the spring so you ARE still growing, you're jobs as they stand right now won't get smaller because of this codeshare because they aren't taking over any US routes you already fly(if anything they'll get busier because you'll be helping incoming passengers transfer and dealing with increased passenger loads), the airline is the only one that has successfully weathered the economic crisis and this will bring in more money at the risk of none(yea...you can be like the others but their service STINKS, they're LOSING MONEY, and their employees are MORE WORRIED THAN YOU and MISERABLE), this will actually give you guys an advantage over other US carriers because suddenly you'll serve more international destinations than Airtran, Jetblue, and Frontier put together, and lastly you're demeanor on here makes me not want to fly with you if that's kind of attitude that you're going to start having. Oh and while I'm at it....your opinion was clear the first time so you don't have to post it an extra 260 something times because I don't know if you've noticed but it doesn't seem producing any kind of a positive effect for you.

THIS IS TERRIBLE. SOUTHWEST EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE FLYING SOUTHWEST JETS TO ANY CITY....IT STARTS WITH PILOTS AND FLIGHT ATTENDANTS LOSING THEIR JOBS AND THE S... ROLLS DOWN HILL. DO NOT THINK IT COULD HAPPEN....LOOK AT DELTA....AMERICAN...UNITED...CONT.......ETC.....ONCE WE START THIS WE WILL NEVER GET IT BACK......I FOR ONE WILL NOT SUPPORT THE COMPANY ON THIS AND WILL NOT FOR ANY CODESHARE THAT PUTS MY CAREER IN THE BULLSEYE. YOU WANT US TO HAVE THE SAME RELATIONSHIP LIKE THE AMERICAN AIRLINES PILOTS....HERE WE GO...BRING IT. GARY HAS BEEN WAITING FOR THIS DAY SINCE HE GOT HERE....HERB AND COLLEEN ARE GONE AND HE SINKS THE SHIP THE EMPOYEES RODE IN ON. HANG ON.

DO NOT CODESHARE OUR COMPANY'S BUSINESS....WE ARE BECOMING LIKE EVEYONE ELSE......THAT EQUALS BROKE

Brand dilution and job outsourcing all in one. This is the new Southwest. Our reputation is being sold off to a 2-year old Mexican startup airline. Hey, they can do it cheap so it must be good. Best of luck to our passengers who buy their tickets on southwest.com who think we fly them all the way to Mexico. Their safety is no longer in our hands.

Repeat the mantra: Doing more with less, doing more with less, doing....

I flew on Volaris in August with my family.

Shortly after takeoff there was screaming coming from the galley. Several passengers jumped up to find out what the comotion was all about. Much to my disgust there appeared almost 150 cockroaches scurrying about the aft galley.

In all my years slying SWA I've never seen a cockroach much less a dirty cabin. So Mr. Gary Kelly enjoy outsourcing your strong culture to an upstart that flies invested Airbus's. This is a hit below the belt not only for your people but also your passengers.

Sincerely,

No more LUV

This is a horrible decision by Southwest. Volaris is an unproven entity, no safety or service record. Notably this agreement does not take effect for 2 years. Most likely it never will and this announcement is just a ploy in the 2+ year pilot contract negotiations. Southwest is outsourcing American jobs in favor of a low rent foreign operator. I fully expect Southwest management to come back to the pilots and ask for wage and benefit reductions if Southwest will drop this sham of an agreement. The fabled trust and spirit of Southwest is being eroded daily by idiotic decisions like this. Southwest is traded under the stock symbol LUV. It should be changed to JAA -- Just Another Airline. Shame on you!!!

It is not surprising that we are now #10 in baggage handling because a few years ago the bean counters, pencil pushers and whiz kids decided that SWA needed to be "Redefined" and set out to reinvent the wheel and create a bunch of unncessary jobs in DAL HDQ. This whole project was run by outside business consultants because, I guess, being number one in everything wasn't good enough.

Front line Employees are doing the very best we can, but we don't have any control over the changes that are ruining our beloved airline. Just talk to any Ground Ops Employee and you'll understand the discouragement. We want to be number one in everything and take care of our Customers, but our Stations are now micro-managed by HDQ,

It is sad and I just hope that someone wakes up before we end up like the other airlines. Please don't blame us--we are the ones taking care of our Customers and we still care.

Go ahead Gary, ram this down our throats. Make our day. WE DARE YOU.

Be the judge...

CODE SHARING:
Code sharing is a business term which was first originated in the airline industry in 1990 when the Australian airline, Qantas Airways and the U.S.'s American Airlines combined services between an array of U.S. domestic cities and Australian cities. The code share was part of a "cooperative services" agreement between the two carriers before the various airline alliances were formed. It refers to a practice where a flight operated by an airline is jointly marketed as a flight for one or more other airlines. Most major airlines today have code sharing partnerships with other airlines, and code sharing is a key feature of the major airline alliances.
The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA airline designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
Under a code sharing agreement participating airlines can present a common flight number for several reasons, including:
Connecting flights - This provides clearer routing for the customer, allowing a customer to book travel from point A to C through point B under one carrier's code, instead of a customer booking from point A to B under one code, and from point B to C under another code. This is not only a superficial addition as cooperating airlines also strive to synchronize their schedules and coordinate luggage handling, which makes transfers between connecting flights less time-consuming.
Flights from both airlines that fly the same route - This provides an apparent increase in the frequency of service on the route by one airline
Perceived service to unserved markets - This provides a method for carriers who do not operate their own aircraft on a given route to gain exposure in the market through display of their flight numbers.
Under a code sharing agreement, the airline that actually operates the flight (the one providing the plane, the crew and the ground handling services) is called the operating carrier. The company or companies that sell tickets for that flight but do not actually operate it are called marketing carriers or validating carriers.

Pilot here, married to a FA. LUV the company, but...

Since ATA, I've watched the pilots extend patience and flexibility to a new management team. At every step there's been good faith and good will by SWAPA. But now? I just think that patience has run out. And what worries me is I know this group. When the trust goes away so do a lot of initiatives like fuel conservation, RNP, extra fly, strollers, etc. This is worse that I witnessed in 2001 so I'd urge the company to rethink the value its placing on this strategy. With respect, ^ bill

time to bring this horse to the soap factory, she is getting old and her manager is getting greedy. Let's save the farm and get rid of the manager.

F/A here, married to Bill the pilot! He's great!

My two cents? This is just not worth it. We need to get back on track and start growing again. If we're now a big airline and there no where to go, then just say it. If our labor costs are killing the company, then just say it. But this is not the way. We are Southwest Airlines and we built this company by going it alone. That really does matter to us. My brother is in the US military and he sometimes talks about the problems the government has with contractor companies doing what the military should be doing. Same thing here. Keep it together. Just my opinion.

Quote:

This is really great news! I'm sorry to see that so many are raining on the parade. It's pretty naive of the people on here to keep making these same flawed points over and over again despite refutations which you seem to simply ignore if they carry any real weight. The airline is NOT shrinking(you haven't dropped any cities), you added Denver last year and Minneapolis is coming in the spring so you ARE still growing, you're jobs as they stand right now won't get smaller because of this codeshare because they aren't taking over any US routes you already fly(if anything they'll get busier because you'll be helping incoming passengers transfer and dealing with increased passenger loads), the airline is the only one that has successfully weathered the economic crisis and this will bring in more money at the risk of none(yea...you can be like the others but their service STINKS, they're LOSING MONEY, and their employees are MORE WORRIED THAN YOU and MISERABLE), this will actually give you guys an advantage over other US carriers because suddenly you'll serve more international destinations than Airtran, Jetblue, and Frontier put together, and lastly you're demeanor on here makes me not want to fly with you if that's kind of attitude that you're going to start having. Oh and while I'm at it....your opinion was clear the first time so you don't have to post it an extra 260 something times because I don't know if you've noticed but it doesn't seem producing any kind of a positive effect for you.
Anonymous — Wed, 11/12/2008 - 15:31

***************************

Yes, sure you are a customer. Not management at all... wink, wink! ;)
By the way I haven't seen a valid refutation to the "no more code shares" case.
LUV STOCK: Almost 8 bucks an hour ago!

"Our stock hit the single digit mark today. 9 bucks. Keep announcing code-shares! party is over my friends....

Anonymous — Wed, 11/12/2008 - 15:20"

This makes me wonder if that is because of the few of you who are spamming this blog with all your whining. What else are investors supposed to think when they see all of the complaints? I'm a union employee myself, and while I am a little apprehensive about this codeshare, if it's a way to gain revenue so we can all keep our jobs, it can only be a good thing. Who's to say we won't be taking over these routes in a few years with our own metal? We can only wait and see what will happen instead of making doomsday predictions.

Keep in mind that once upon a time, Southwest was just a startup company, and without the support of our Customers, we wouldnt be here.

About five years ago, management got us all excited about going outside of the border- Hawaii, Mexico, Canada were mentioned! We fed on the anticipation of something new and exciting. Morale was high which led to a highly productive workforce. Two years ago, an impending huge historic announcement was released from Dallas. Everyone thought, at last, we're going to Hawaii or Puerto Rico. When the "historic day" came, "New gates & boarding process!!!" was the earth shattering news. As the air slowly leaked out of the balloons, everyone walked around scratching their heads...."This is it? You've gotta be kidding!"

At one time, we thrived on being part of a company that took chances and truly trusted their employees to follow through on the risks. Now we watch with dismay and disappointment as our jobs and dreams are farmed out to a foreign airline with no record or reputation of the "positively outrageous service" that's expected of us. I kind of feel like the kid that was promised a brand new bike for Christmas, only to find out that the new kid across the street got it instead. Oh well, four flights a day between Minneapolis and Chicago is a nice stocking stuffer.

I have an idea for Plane Smart Business. Whatever happened to that money wasting entity?
Lets code share/outsource Mr. Kelly's job and Mr. Ven De Ven's job to the Mexican and Canadian CEOs. Should save us millions. No golden parachutes allowed though. Anybody think they'll go for it?

>>>Our stock hit the single digit mark today. 9 bucks. Keep announcing code-shares!

More disingenous information, as if the $9 LUV price was a direct result of the codeshare news. It's funny, but the AP story I'm looking at opens with:

"NEW YORK – A disheartened Wall Street fell for the third straight session Wednesday as investors absorbed another series of dismal corporate reports **and news that the government won't buy banks' soured mortgage assets after all.**" [My **]

As I said earlier, I fully understand the frustration that the pilot contract negotiations have run 2 years, and also that your 401K and PS accounts have taken hits (Our have too, you know), and that the pilot group feels the need to do "something" rather than sit idly by and watch flat 2009 growth. Did it ever occur to anyone that another reason (unmentioned by SWA) for the codeshare might be to retain operational flexibility on the domestic side should, say the new DL/NW combo decide to close or drawdown hubs at MEM or CVG, ala' the way USAirways gutted PIT? Maybe another carrier shutting down? Have any of the armchair CEOs here considered these (or other) possibilities?

As many of you may know, Circuit City recently announced the closure of 100+ stores, and a couple of days later filed for Chapter 11 bancruptcy. Meanwhile, their arch rival Best Buy continues to do well. The Consumerist.com got a copy of an email from Best Buy's head dudes to all their employees, and although it's a different industry, there are obvious lessons here that are just as applicable to SWA. Circuit City made some bonehead moves over the years, while Best Buy didn't. I think everyone can agree that SWA management has made similar good moves that have kept us out of the situations that most airlines find themselves in. What SWA folks need to be doing (ALL of us) is focusing on the Customer, instead of this "The Sky Is Falling" and "SWA is doomed" crap, and let management do their jobs while each employee does theirs (and nobody else's).

The Best Buy memo:

Best Buy says:
A Message from Brad Anderson, Brian Dunn and Bob Willett

To all employees:

This morning, we announced that we've seen a sudden change in consumer spending, in our comparable store sales, and in our expectations for this year's earnings. We'd like to provide more context around these changes and their impact on our business.

The year started off well, with total company comparable store sales (sales at stores open more than 14 months) growing 4 percent for the first half of our fiscal year, a period that runs March through August. Our results were fairly consistent until September, when our comparable store sales turned negative, declining by 1 percent. Then our comparable store sales softened further in October, declining by nearly 8 percent, amid unprecedented changes in the financial markets, a deteriorating economy and weakening consumer sentiment. From where we stand today, we could see total company comparable store sales for the rest of the fiscal year decline by 5 percent to 15 percent.

Revenue gains are important to our business model because the majority of our costs ─ such as rent and store operating costs ─ are fixed. Typically, when comparable store sales increase by 3 percent or better, revenue growth outstrips expense growth (including merit increases, rising health care costs and the like), and our earnings rise. Currently, due to comparable store sales declines as well as spending increases, we have expenses rising faster than revenue. That's why we're now anticipating an earnings decrease for the year.
Specifically, today we also announced a new range for our earnings expectations: $2.30 to $2.90 per diluted share. The midpoint of our range is a 17-percent earnings decline compared with the $3.12 per share we earned last fiscal year.

Let us be very clear. These reduced earnings expectations reflect the unprecedented tumult in the financial services industry, which has reduced consumer spending across the board in retail. The outstanding work of our 165,000 employees doesn't make us immune to our environment. We can't change the overall level of consumer spending, but we can focus on deepening our relationships with customers wherever we interact with them: in our stores, on our Web sites and through our call centers.

While our comps have been negative, we gained market share in September and October. So we're getting a bigger piece of a business that is currently shrinking. Customer satisfaction remains at all-time highs. Employee turnover is at historic lows. We firmly believe that our strategy of customer centricity is of great value in driving our performance versus the industry, and that's the strategy we plan to pursue to continue to strengthen our position in the marketplace.

We must find ways to win with the customers who are coming to us today. Serving our customers better than anyone else is the best way to create value for customers, employees and shareholders alike. We need every employee engaged in serving customers better, and more efficiently. We want your unique perspective on what we should do differently in this market, based on what you see and touch, and using the talents you have.

**We could let today's turmoil distract us from serving customers. Other retailers might do that. But we will not. Instead, we will use these circumstances to redouble our efforts and deepen our commitment to each other, to our company, to our strategy and to the customers we serve. In so doing, we will strengthen and fortify ourselves as a team. A winning team. That's who we are, and that's Best Buy.**

Brad Anderson, vice chairman and chief executive officer
Brian Dunn, president and chief operating officer
Bob Willett, chief executive officer of International and chief information officer

First this and I hear baggage fees next. What is going on with the LUV airline. ?

Geez Gary, you're gonna code share me right out of a job aren't ya!?!

President elect Obama is promising a $3,000 tax credit for every company that creates a new job, wonder if Southwest will get the credit for the new hires over at Volaris due to THEIR growth.

Still an FO, with more than a ppl

As a Southwest flight attendant I feel we should fly our planes into Mexico.. Even Mesa Airlines aka US Airways EXPRESS fly directly to Mexico and we should as well.

Just read the letter put out by the President of SWAPA. Looks like Gary is one to make promises he can't keep. Looks like he agrees to certain terms with his employees and then changes his mind. Well, my mind has changed about this company. SWA will not go on without its pilots. Reggie, you can be SOOO mad at us, maybe they will make you a capt soon Mr. 96%. Woo Hoo is right, I can't believe you missed two questions. My 8 year old made a 100.

your opinion was clear the first time so you don't have to post it an extra 260 something times because I don't know if you've noticed but it doesn't seem producing any kind of a positive effect for you.

********************************************

Yeah, you are a customer that cannot stand almost 300 mad people venting their frustration about this code share... Sure, you are a customer.... ;)

Hey Reggie,

You might want to rethink you PPL arguement. It takes a heck of a lot more then getting your PPL. So for all you GO employess who think you could do the pilots job tomorrow. Go get all you ratings, build your time, try to ge thired at SWA or anywhere else that will take you. It only took most of 12-15 years to reach this level. Then put your career and family on the line everytime you have to get a medical, see a doctor, have a check ride or God forbid screw up and have to do a carpet dance and maybe get fired. We dont need to talk about how hard the job is. I think most intelligent people know it isnt as easy as Reggie thinks. So good luck and I hope to see you out on the line in 15 more years.

Oh and in the mean time while you are flying that 172 VFR. Remeber we fly in the real weather. That includes whiteouts, thunderstorms, very low visibility approaches. You get the idea. Oh yeh if we screw up it will cost $2 billion. That right with a B. You screw up in your GO job what will it cost. Not to mention the lives at stake. Get a clue Reggie. By the way been to Mexico 1000 times. The ill will it will cause amongst the employees wont be worth your little passes.

goodbye cruel world, I'm leaving you today, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye. Goodbye all you people, there's nothing you can say, to make me change my mind, Goodbye.

Pink Floyd, about SWA

If you want to have the safety of a SWA crew up front...If you want the service of a SWA crew in the back.Fly a SWA aircraft.

The possible loss of a code share aircraft hauling SWA passengers could very well be the end of SWA as we know it.
If GK keeps pushing this type of code share.It WILL be the end of the SWA I know and used to Luv.

No longer a "happy camper".

Reggie is in his "department"..... hmmmm translated "GO".......

man, I bet he'd have the best job in the world if it weren't for all those "overpaid crybaby pilots" / FAs. while we're talking about it, I bet his job would be loads more fun without all the airplanes and passengers too!! Who actually needs the hassle of flying passengers in airplanes. without all that trouble, he could just nonrev around the world and have parties on the deck at HQ .

Ok guys, ease up on Reggie. He can't help it. He is pumped full of kool-aid and at HDQ he is totally insulated from the real world. He is luvin his job----good for him. Quit trying to burst his bubble with hard, cruel facts.

After reading the SWAPA letter from President Carl I'm dismayed that Gary Kelly gave his word he would abide by the negotiated language on codeshares then turn around and violate it anyway.

Gary just lost my trust and my drive to care about SWA anymore.

Quoting Blue Christmas...

About five years ago, management got us all excited about going outside of the border- Hawaii, Mexico, Canada were mentioned! We fed on the anticipation of something new and exciting. Morale was high which led to a highly productive workforce. Two years ago, an impending huge historic announcement was released from Dallas. Everyone thought, at last, we're going to Hawaii or Puerto Rico. When the "historic day" came, "New gates & boarding process!!!" was the earth shattering news. As the air slowly leaked out of the balloons, everyone walked around scratching their heads...."This is it? You've gotta be kidding!"

***************

I remember all these grandiose announcements... And how excited we were....

Ladies and gentleman, Allegiant Airlines (yes Allegiant, the only PROFITABLE US based airline last quarter) just announced that will pursue International service (Mexico). That makes us pretty much the ONLY airline in this country without international or Puerto Rico and Hawaii service in this country. Good night and good luck! (I sold my stock @ $18.02 years ago)

About five years ago, management got us all excited about going outside of the border- Hawaii, Mexico, Canada were mentioned! We fed on the anticipation of something new and exciting. Morale was high which led to a highly productive workforce. Two years ago, an impending huge historic announcement was released from Dallas. Everyone thought, at last, we're going to Hawaii or Puerto Rico. When the "historic day" came, "New gates & boarding process!!!" was the earth shattering news. As the air slowly leaked out of the balloons, everyone walked around scratching their heads...."This is it? You've gotta be kidding!"

*********

OMG, that's so true! And we spent several million in the new boarding procedures and that scam called business select.... All that money could had helped launch Intl. Service.... A lot more people will be more excited than with this mess....

I don't know if DAL is very happy with this milestone, but this is now THE MOST COMMENTED ITEM IN THE SOUTHWEST BLOG'S HISTORY! How sad that most of the comments are so full of anger, frustration and resentment...

From "Plane buzz"...

PlaneBuzz
« PlaneBusiness Banter Now Posted | Main

Southwest Airlines Announces Codeshare And Some Pilots Are Not Happy

Today we have a new subject to talk about.

Well, I guess the main topic is a familiar one. Pilots who are not happy with things that management is doing for, er, to them.

But in this case, the players on the playing field have changed.

You may have read the news release yesterday in which Southwest Airlines announced a new codeshare agreement with Volaris -- a Mexican airline.

In the release Monday, Southwest said that the airlines will coordinate flight schedules and reservation systems, allowing Southwest customers to book flights to Mexico using both carriers. Volaris currently serves cities including Mexico City, Tijuana, Cancun, Guadalajara, Mexicali and Acapulco.

But wait just a minute.

Who stands to lose potential flying if the airline goes ahead with this codeshare agreement, as well as the agreement already announced with WestJet?

That's right. Southwest Airlines' pilots.

Today the PlaneBusiness email box has received more than a fistful of emails from Southwest pilots who are not happy campers. To say that this is an unusual occurrence would be a hefty understatement.

Here is an excerpt from one of the longer notes:

"In really simple terms, and feel free to use it (just don’t credit me, a bit of a witch hunt going on here), it should not be called Code Sharing, but Outsourcing.

[Southwest CEO] Kelly and SWAPA negotiated a codeshare (outsourcing) agreement in the new contract during the initial current negotiations. This was about a year ago. He stated publicly that even though it had not been voted on, that he would honor that agreement. He has since come back to our negotiators and said he wants to re-negotiate that portion of the new contract. Meanwhile, he is doing all the codesharing (outsourcing) he can while he “slow rolls” our contract negotiations.
WestJet has announced 15% growth after our agreement with them.
Volaris says they will double in size.
Kelly cut 6% of our flying.
Now the rumor is that Republic is negotiating with Kelly to take over our short haul intra-Texas flying.
I am a 20+ year guy and am really disgusted with what is going on here. I spent several years at a Lorenzo airline and am seeing parallels that I thought would never happen here. The line employees realize they are just numbers to Kelly."
Where is the LUV?

Yes it's now been two years and counting and there is still no new contract between the pilots and the company. From the sound and tone of the notes we received this morning, it sounds like maybe the tone from the pilots' side has just taken a little turn towards a more defensive posture.

Listening to the company excuses makes me think that we need to look at other airlines with renewed respect: They all (but us) have managed to enter international (and Alaska, PR and Hawaii) markets with more or less success. They all did the paperwork, trained their crews, made the investments and pulled it off. If we cannot do the same and make money, well, we are not that extraordinary.

Point in case - code sharing of this type has hurt every previous airlines' employees due to outsourcing their work. The only way to make code sharing work is through synergistic code sharing (i.e. Westjet flies people down to the US and then uses our assets to turn the plane, and we fly people to Canada and use their assets to turn the plane). This type of code sharing can provide a win-win solution to growth and profits for both airlines.

ATA is an example of how code sharing will fail and ruin our brand name which has been so carefully developed over 35+ years. ATA started flying routes that directly competed with SWA routes - how did that work when the SWA brand was extremely tarnished when we stranded thousands of customers with tickets bought on Southwest.com when ATA went bankrupt. How much did it cost to try to make things 'right' for those customers?

As all pilots have to have been a captain with over 1000 hours of PIC experience, and a large percentage did so all over the world (not just near international), why is it the company does not have faith in our own, 'Best', employees? We would rather risk more brand dilution by betting on an unknown, unproven, start up?

Senior leadership has been quoted as changing Herb's proven success plan: Take care of your internal employees, they will take care of the customers, which will take care of the shareholders" to "shareholders are the number one priority". The good will, spirit, and PRODUCTIVITY of our employees, cannot, and should not be underestimated by the number crunchers.

Thousands of students have done case studies on SWA, and what made it successful, and they all come back to the Southwest Spirit which is being eroded faster by these outsourcing decisions than I ever thought possible.

This is a very sad chapter in Southwest's history. I hope and pray that it will be the long novel I dreamed of when applying here, but the history of disgruntled and bankrupt airlines going down this path foreshadows a quick ending to one of the best stories written of all time.

Extremely concerned and disappointed employee

If Gary wants to cut costs..He needs to get rid of the Rx or API team whatever their title is...Just a bunch of arrogant emplpyees.. I would like to see Mr.Kelly and this HQ's guy Reggie work a gate with back to back flights that are over selling all by themselves!!!!! Apparently WN thinks one agent can do it all alone.

This airline has become the most boring in the world. Fuel prices are going down (I believe we are starting to lose on those hedges) and every other carrier is announcing new cities, new ideas, expansion, etc. Meanwhile, we became stagnant, almost paralyzed. Our "thrills" now come in the form of code-share announcements, costume contests, chili cookoffs, raffles, the weekly trivia in Today@SWA, surveys that nobody cares about, "new" boarding processes, etc. I almost look forward to the change of snack twice a year or the new SPIRIT magazine at the beginning of the month... Those are my thrills nowadays... I'm seriously thinking about leaving.

Great another legacy farming it flying out.

Can we, at a minimum, all agree that this is contentious and toxic to employee relations?

If you think that this is just a few pilots that are upset by this, you have gravely miscalculated the sentiment. "Bad Faith" contract negotiations are a quick way to ruin a business.

"That's why this little kitty got a 96%. SNAP, SNAP! REGINALD HAS LEFT THE BUILDING"

Whew! Nuff said.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Southwest Airlines Blog

Nuts about Southwest is all about our Employees, Customers, airplanes, and airports. We really are Nuts about Southwest and we hope that our Readers will share that passion by posting their own comments.

For more information about the blog and participating, please visit our User Guide.

Syndicate This Blog

Exclusive Southwest Offers Right on Your Desktop

Download Our
Mommy Blogger Patches

Southwest Airlines

Tags



     View all tags

Archives

 2009
   •  November 2009
   •  October 2009
   •  September 2009
   •  August 2009
   •  July 2009
   •  June 2009
   •  May 2009
   •  April 2009
   •  March 2009
   •  February 2009
   •  January 2009
 2008
 2007
 2006

Categories

Link Luv

CREATED
BY RD2